User talk:TheMatulaak

Tips
Hi -- I saw your message on my talk page. A few more tips: -- Elphion (talk) 17:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * When you add a section to a talk page, add it at the bottom of the page -- that's the WP convention. This is done automatically if you use the "New Section" tab in the Read | Edit | etc. choices near the top of the page.
 * Don't forget to sign in when you edit. Otherwise your edits show up identified by your current IP number, and are not linked to your user ID.
 * Always sign your talk comments by ending them with the magical incantation   The four tildes are automatically converted to your sig when you save the page.
 * There's a vast amount of markup and template magic, which takes a while to become fluent with. I strongly recommend setting time aside to begin exploring the help links above.  They will help you come up to speed on (a) our conventions when editing; (b) what constitutes legitimate content in WP; (c) magic to use so you're not reinventing the wheel.  But don't try to absorb it all at once; there's a lot there.
 * Specifically for Tolkien: As you inferred from my edits, references from the books are preferred to fan sites like Tolkien Gateway.  Take the trouble to run down the source in Tolkien for these cases.  (Fan sites have a habit of drawing inferences that are not in the text, though some are better than others in this regard).  Even better are critical evaluations from established scholars like Shippey or Hammond & Scull.  For references from LotR and the Hobbit, always include chapter names, because the pagination from edition to edition varies widely -- the page number can be way off, so the chapter name helps people find the reference even if they don't have the edition you're using.  (The pagination for Silm, UT, Letters, and HoME is more consistent across editions.)

Arnor edits
You asked for feedback on your edits to Arnor. beat me to it, but I'll add some remarks. -- Elphion (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * You usually don't need to use the HTTP address of WP pages (specifically, you don't need all those underscores). Typically, if you just cut and paste the article's title, you'll get the form desired for the link.  (Occasionally special punctuation in the title can cause problems.)
 * Watch out for hyphen vs dash. Use the N-dash rather than the hyphen when appropriate, see MOS:DASH.
 * You can avoid repeating all the grisly bibliographic detail of references by giving a name to repeated references, including detail once and then referring in other refs to the reference by name. (This is one class of changes made by ChrisGualtieri.)
 * A problem with that approach is that you often want references to different page numbers in the same source, and we don't have a common convention for how to handle that. ChrisGualtieri's changes give a single reference for each specific page, but there are other ways to do it; see Help:References and page numbers.  As I mentioned above, for LotR and the Hobbit you want to be sure that the chapter name appears in the footnote, which generally means including the chapter name in the basic bibliographic information of the (base) footnote -- so a base footnote for each chapter referenced.
 * Specifically for the Adaptations section: I don't know anything about the games, so I tend not to edit information about them.  However, I have removed the reference to WP you use as a source:  WP is not a reliable source!  You have already linked to the relevant article, and that's OK; but if anybody challenges the information, you need a real source.
 * You can actually use specific references, I am a supporter of the format. In this case it'd result as page 54 following the source. You can do this with the sfn template and have the same result. There are many ways to do it, but I find the Harvard style to be misleading or useless in places. Sometimes I'll have 40 citations from the same work, another 20 from another and a third with another 20 or so. The result in the Harvard format would be another 80 lines in the referencing that is easy to misread and results in a two-stage search for the source whereas this page listings bring you to the source (viewable inline) and the page it is cited on. I'll not nitpick too much, but there are about 10 ways to do sourcing and still have it "right". ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Emmanuel Baptist Church (Belleville, Ontario)
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Emmanuel Baptist Church (Belleville, Ontario), may be copied from http://www.emmanuelbaptist-belleville.ca/bebchistory.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 00:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Amita (fruit juice)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amita (fruit juice), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.coca-colahellenic.gr/Productsandbrands/juice/Amita/AmitaRegular/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright policies on Wikipedia
Hello TheMatulaak, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:41, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Lord of the Rings Online, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rohan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Commendation for Work on Nicholson Catholic College March 5, 2014
Thank you for your contributions to the Nicholson Catholic College Wikipedia page so far; its a great help to the school and the Algonquin and Lakeshore Catholic District School Board! For historical purposes (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Amita Logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Amita Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Battlefield 4 China Rising.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Battlefield 4 China Rising.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emmanuel Baptist Church (Belleville, Ontario)


The article Emmanuel Baptist Church (Belleville, Ontario) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No suggested evidence of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Madg2011 (talk) 04:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)