User talk:TheMightyCraken

Speedy deletion nomination of Emanuel Sferios
Hello TheMightyCraken,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Emanuel Sferios for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. BiH (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to Pachliopta jophon
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! hamiltonstone (talk) 10:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to SkyDrive. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi there, I'm Lixxx235. I have been a registered user since 2010 and I am currently a rollbacker and reviewer. Are you still interested in the adoption program? If so, I'd be honored to adopt you. If you would like me to adopt you, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Lixxx235 Got a complaint? 20:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

File:SurfacePro3Pic.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SurfacePro3Pic.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

February 2019
Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as ARCTIC (ISS Facility). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Plagiarism, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Good-faith edits reverted
Meta Platforms, Inc. did not exist at the time these products were released. Per prior practice, we display the name of the company as it was upon the product's release. In addition, the Oculus > Meta/Horizon rebranding is expected to take effect in 2022, and Oculus Quest 2 will be WP:COMMONNAME even if it is reissued at some point under Meta branding. I expect that the Meta branding will take effect on any future hardware revisions of the Quest series. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Duncan Baird Publishers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duncan Baird Publishers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Duncan Baird Publishers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ~Cheers, Ten  Ton  Parasol  21:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Following up on the notice above: in that discussion, other editors have cast doubt on the list of publications in the article text and indicated a different takeover fate of the company in question. The level of detail in the article text indicates that there must have been one or more alternative sources used in creating the article: it would be helpful if you could identify these, either here or in the AfD discussion? AllyD (talk) 07:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)