User talk:TheMrCoolCat2010

November 2010
Just wondering, why did you put the AfD template on Pilot (ally mcbeal) after I tagged it for speedy deletion? - Rich (MTCD) Talk Page 19:14, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

No Idea I Just Saw It In The Help Menu And Got Confused Cause Im New
 * For future reference you need to place the Hang on tag on an article you created if you wish to contest its speedy deletion. Pol430 (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Pilot (ally mcbeal). Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Pol430 (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Harry Hills Funny Times
Hello TheMrCoolCat2010. I have moved the page Harry Hills Funny Times that you created into your user space at User:TheMrCoolCat2010/Harry Hills Funny Times where you can test and experiment with the template and wiki syntax at your own pace. When your article is ready, just retitle it by moving it to the new title. Kind regards, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 50th Anniversary


A tag has been placed on 50th Anniversary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pontificalibus (talk) 22:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fionnlagh Dunbar


A tag has been placed on Fionnlagh Dunbar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 20:47, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faimily


A tag has been placed on Faimily requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 20:41, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Cauld
Hello, TheMrCoolCat2010, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Cauld whether the article Cauld should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Cauld, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Gaijin42 (talk) 20:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Flittin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flittin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flittin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:05, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of highest-grossing films. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_films&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)