User talk:TheMysteryBox010

Hello. Sorry if I am doing this wrong I only made this to correct the Billy Garland post. Look, all I was just putting was, Billy is Tupac's father. Tupac was born in the 1970s so if Billy died in 1960 tupac would have never been born. In an interview Billy said "I met my son tupac fifteen years after he was born and it was one of the greatest feelings of my life." Again, billy is most likely still alive and not dead, if he is dead there's no way he died in the sixties. It's impossible. How could someone die and have a kid thirteen years later and make an interview about his son when his son dies while you're dead? Make Sense? No, it doesn't! Sorry, it's not my intentions to mess anything up or insult you, but I'm just trying to prove a point. Why would someone make a false rumor about someone's dad dying before they were born and even meeting them. It's just false. Sorry. -TheMysteryBox