User talk:TheNewPhobia/Archives/2008/September

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Nicktrop homepage.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Nicktrop homepage.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:21, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

i see that you marked it as vandalism could you please give to me the proper backwards page as i was trying to display the word in a proper sentence. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGodcell (talk • contribs) 10:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Bot Newsletter
Don't worry, I already delivered this month's. IF YOU GET THIS, DON"T DELIVER. I wouldn't want a bunch of angry members saying I am spamming their talk pages! If it works, can you deliver the newsletter on the first of each respective month? If you could do that in the future, that would be great. Thanks!  Meis funny  Gab How was I? 23:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Nicktropolis
Hi, do you intend to nominate this formally, or do you just want feedback? It might be a good idea to list it at peer review ? Let me know. PS I see you have an editor review - I'll see if I can give you one as well. Cheers how do you turn this on  17:41, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Any progress on this, Jon? how do you turn this on  00:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Paul Malignaggi
What's the big idea reverting in the Paul Malignaggi article? 202.69.189.29 (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Personality Psychology fix
Hi, you and user:Superflewis keep reverting Personality Psychology to a state in which all of its content is duplicated a bunch of times, despite my attempts to fix the problem. Why are you doing this? (talk) 18 September 2008 —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC).