User talk:TheOgrelordShrek420

==Recent edits to [[wikipedia are snakes

March 2015
Hello, I'm Stevietheman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to La Grange, Kentucky because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. At this point, this is vandalism, because it has been explained to you why this addition doesn't belong. Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 16:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at La Grange, Kentucky. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Kharkiv07 Talk  00:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Little Bo Peep has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Little Bo Peep was changed by TheOgrelordShrek420 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965084 on 2015-03-31T15:51:57+00:00.

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Phil Mitchell has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Phil Mitchell was changed by TheOgrelordShrek420 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965614 on 2015-05-28T18:10:04+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Snake venom. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Snake venom was changed by TheOgrelordShrek420 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96393 on 2015-05-28T18:11:41+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Common starling, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Common starling was changed by TheOgrelordShrek420 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974168 on 2015-05-28T18:14:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Common starling. William Avery (talk) 18:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)