User talk:TheOldJacobite/Archive 10

Hashshashin
This is probably not even the most ridiculous edit war I've ever been involved in, which is sad enough, but you're going to have to stop removing the reference to Assassin's Creed. I wouldn't mind deleting the whole section, but your arguments against a video game and in favour of an equally trashy book do not help the situation. (I mean, I'm all in favour of being a pompous jerk on Wikipedia, but about this? Really?) Hopefully my last edit will satisfy everyone. Can we leave it the way it is now? Adam Bishop (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment removal
Hi there. Why did you remove this comment? I doesn't look random to me; it's a helpful comment for improving the article, despite being poorly worded. -kotra (talk) 23:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response on my talk page. I have responded there. -kotra (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Culloden
I'm sorry about that. I've had a bit of a bad day, and wasn't logged in when I made that edit. Please excuse the insult I left in the edit summary. Thanks.  Oliver Fury, Esq. message  •  contributions  17:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Edward Fitzgerald
I was doing a history merge on the page, to make sure that all the editors are properly credited in the article history. I'm working from this list of possible cut-and-paste moves. Graham 87 13:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm about to do the same thing with the talk page. Graham 87 13:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Apology Re: Left Anarchism / Anarchist Socialism / Socialist Anarchism
My apologies. Sorry for being so rash with attempts to make changes (as well as to the "libertarian socialism" section). I'll have to work harder at more acceptable means of making any such changes in the future, which will be backed up with research (not simply by me but also by others) and references. --Radical Mallard June 25, 2009, 4:34 PM EST

Tramp
Not nonsense but fact, Jac, even if too much, see W. H. Davies. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:32, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Quite so, Jac. It seems Ian may have to wait for that article on One-legged Flute-playing Medieval Faux Tramps. Or am I just living in the past? Cheers, Martinevans123 (talk) 19:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

William Wallace
Thought you might be interested to know that most of those edits you reverted were by, one of Scotland Rules' sockpuppets, now blocked. Dougweller (talk) 05:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Plea for clemency
Just listen to the man, can't you cut a guy a break?! Skomorokh  15:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Uuuhhhh... wow. How can I not listen to such a clearly troubled individual, and take mercy upon his plight.  That truly gives me pause.  Thanks. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  15:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Social Anarchism page
Hi there. It might be a good idea just to write your position as to why the text should be added on the talk page regardless as to whether the other user keeps deleting. Problem with 3RR is it can go both ways in reverting. Happy editing Ottawa4ever (talk) 00:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your advice. As it happens, I have no particular feelings about the content one way or the other, I simply do not believe referenced material should be deleted without a good explanation.  In this case, the user has provided very little in the way of explanation.  I do intend to post on the article talk page on the matter, though.  Thanks again. ---  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive'  00:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Experimental pop music
That was pretty much my thought process too - nothing really to merge. Thanks for dropping by - I appreciate it.--Sabrebd (talk) 15:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Bannockburn
I've responded to your (perfectly legitimate) challenge on the image on the Bannockburn talkpage Monstrelet (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Socialist or social
Why vandalism? (It a term used since 95', and that classification individualist-socialist is very older, not from 95')... and my edition is refferenced... --Nihilo 01 (talk) 19:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Upps, that was not for me. Sorry. I explained the change in discussion. Thanks.--Nihilo 01 (talk) 19:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi!, but I see this one Right-anarchism (I'm thinking in redirect it). --Nihilo 01 (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Cult Film
Hello RJ - Thanks for reverting that ridiculous list on cult film - I'm pretty sure I had cut it out before and someone must have added it back. That whole article needs to be re-done. Sensei48 (talk) 23:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


 * "You might notice, though, that I did a lot of work in the article last month. Cheers! "


 * I did indeed, and a really quality and necessary sets of edits they were. There are still some matters of phrasing and content to go - one editor early on announced that the term had been "invented" in 1979 or something like that. But a journey of a thousand miles... Regards, Sensei48 (talk) 00:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
I didn't know in this Wikipedia you should discuss a move of minor articles (especially if the move is referenced in any form). Can you help me with the discussion pages, I'm not so fast with my English, thanks. --Nihilo 01 (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD
Are you going to put Avant-pop and Avant-progressive rock up for AfD? I would but my free time is limited these days. I will support such nominations, though. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * They're not directly related, so it's best to list them separately. WesleyDodds (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Alternative rock
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Alternative rock/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:10, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Hyper
I removed the talk page warning - and suggested the IP calm down and I delivered a 3RR violation warning, hopefully that will help...Modernist (talk) 03:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Counterculture of the 1960s
First, thanks for watching and your edits. Although I did not work on the British Invasion section, I do believe there may be relevance. I'm not defending the removed material specifically, because I think it was weak as to importance to the era. What is perhaps most relevant for the U.S. is the mass acceptance of a completely new musical genre (and that movement's progenitors/their ideas) by the young public at the time the counterculture was first gaining steam. I know that by definition the BI was accomplished and over by 1966, but in terms of the ongoing influx and intellectual influence of new English artists, it continued. I can elaborate if you are interested. Other thoughts or expansion? Thanks...Learner001 (talk) 20:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tannhauser Gate
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tannhauser Gate. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Tannhauser Gate. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)