User talk:TheOldJacobite/Archive 14

Saint Cummin
Those comments are from the primary author of the article, the basic details of which check out. Although the mode of expression is idiosyncratic, I think the fellow is genuine in trying to improve the encyclopaedia. Skomorokh  15:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Metroid Prime 3: Corruption edits not vandalism
Hi there. With regard to this revert, I wanted to let you know that the IP user's edits were not clearly vandalism. Please be careful - Wikipedia maintains a strict definition of what constitutes vandalism, and a charge of vandalism carries with it an implicit assumption of bad faith. I agree that the edits were probably not completely necessary, but I believe the edits were made in good faith and a revert stating that they didn't add value to the article would have been more appropriate.

Thanks. KieferSkunk (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * (Re reply) No problem. I left my comment before looking at the IP user's edit history - after seeing that, I saw that he was vandalizing other articles, so I understand why you were quick to revert the MP3 edits as vandalism as well.  No worries. &mdash; KieferSkunk (talk) &mdash; 02:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Suspicious edit by IP
I had spotted this edit but couldn't quite make out the actual content change. Its the sort of thing I occasionally come across. Can you clarify for me for future reference? Best. RashersTierney (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Steely Dan composition section
Hey there RepublicanJacobite. I just wanted to let you know that I've reinstated the section of the Steely Dan article that has everyone in a huff, but added a new reference to (hopefully) address your concern. I also renamed the thing, as its title seems to me to be the potential source of confusion regarding the section's claims. I discussed my reasoning in the talk section. I figured I should let you know, since I don't like to undo the work of editors I respect without an explanation : ) Colinclarksmith (talk) 02:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

IP Hopping vandals and open proxies
Hello. Since you have an IP hopping vandal, this suggests to me that you might have a vandal that uses open proxies or Tor. Could you please report the IPs that this vandal used to WikiProject on open proxies? I would do this, but I need to get to lunch. Jesse Viviano (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention that I already reported 201.68.108.120 for you. Jesse Viviano (talk) 18:24, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Michael Collins
Im sorry you feel my edit was vandalism. That list has been like that for almost a year and being a historical movie people interested in the era and the Republican movement should be able to see who played key roles in the events portrayed in the movie. Nobody else has had a problem with the cast until you. I hope you can agree for historicl value that real people in the cast should be shown. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by King Cobb (talk • contribs) 00:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Deadwood Factual Errors
Hello,

I have started a discussion on the Deadwood Talk Page regarding the factual errors section, which I feel should be removed. Since you have recently edited that section, I invite you to participate.-- Sea photo Talk 02:09, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Just a note
Just a note, the vandal impersonated me; I did not warn you for vandalism. Cheers! Samwb123Please read 22:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Banned user socking as anon IP
BTW, just a heads up, the anon 122.105.42.116 that you've been reverting on Murray Rothbard is the banned user Karmaisking. You can identify him as he geolocates to Australia, and usually edits tendentiously on topics related to libertarianism. regards, LK (talk) 09:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)