User talk:TheOldJacobite/Archive 26

Good news
A trusted editor has graced us with the title "gentleman". As a side note it appears the same talented individual has addressed your move issue. See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  02:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice! ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 02:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Pulp Fiction reverts
The User:Let Me Eat Cake was doing the editing in correspondance to a GA review. RAP (talk) 19:06 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I saw the GA review, and the changes he made went far beyond what was called for there. And, if this was his intention, he should have made that clear in his edit summaries, which were vague to the point of being worthless.  When you remove nearly 7,000 characters from the article, you should be very clear what your reasons are for doing so.  At this point, he can post on the talk page explaining his edits, per BRD. ---  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive  19:09, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Uranium
Please reconsider your deletion, Rosie and I have moved it to Uranium mining in Namibia and removed most of the essay. Best solution would now be to delete the capital letter original title and close AFD.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: User:90.195.244.182
WP:AIV is for, as the top of the page states, "obvious and persistent vandals and spammers only". I dispute that this user is obviously a vandal, as their edits appear constructive. If they were an obvious vandal, I would see their edits being reverted left and right, but it appears that you just have a problem with their specific contributions to one page. I welcome you pointing out specific cases where the user added incorrect information, but to just list them as a vandal without pointing out "how" when it's not obvious, well, it's unactionable. - Running On Brains (talk) 16:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

SOTL
Hi, many thanks for the belated welcome, and the cookies! I've been around on Wikipedia for a long time, but only just ventured into making edits any more significant than punctuation, grammar and style!

I respect your undoing of my revision to the SOTL page, and have added a section to the article's talk page, on which I'd be really interested to hear your input!

Again, thanks for making me feel welcome to Wikipedia. Finally taking the plunge to edit Wikipedia, with references, is like going to the gym for the first time... you imagine everyone there will be condescending and unhelpful, but instead 99% don't even notice you're new, and there's always one kind person who'll show you how to use the equipment. Greg (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Impossible IP
No idea As you can rightly tell, this is not a valid IP address in IPv4 or IPv6. Post this to WP:VPT and the wizards over there can decode it. Please let me know what you find... —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:56, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow This is how ipv6 addresses look. Huh. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hexadecimal I suppose this is a pretty straightforward matter, actually... To increase the number of IP addresses that are possible, one approach is to use a base-16 counting scheme. So rather than have numbers like "174.9.38.548" you could use the letters A through F in addition to the digits 0–9. It's probably a happy coincidence that some of these IP addresses contain words like "BEEF CAFE". —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

No Country for Old Men (film)
Good day,

I fully understand your point of view in deleting some of the subsection: "The hunter, the hunted and triplet occurrences". However, may I suggest that you kindly consider one of the following options:

- What you have deleted refers to the 'triplet occurrences', and therefore, you may need to update the title and remove "triplet occurrences" from it,

- You may also consider deleting the whole subsection altogether since it may have become too small and less relevant,

- You may keep the original subsection pre-edited, extract it and move it by its whole from this page to the Novel's page "No Country for Old Men",

Thank you for taking the time to read this.

~Star of Amman 01:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Star of Amman (talk • contribs)

Whew
We finally finished with that project of checking and reverting Pe's vandalism. I wanted to say thanks for the help that you provided. As I was checking them I found your name again and again has having reverted him when the edits were made originally so many thanks for that also. Due to this I may be on hiatus so it is good to know that you are here to keep an eye on things. Cheers and enjoy the rest of your weekend. MarnetteD | Talk 15:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Any editor can discuss how a talk page is used with the editors involved. If the issues are sever enough, you can use one of the UW (user warning) templates. I don't see a reason for an admin to step in at this time. I will note that there are issues on the editors talk page, mostly for 3RR issues. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

It's Only a Paper Moon (song)
I think you are correct in removing many of the artist for this song, even if it includes one that I added. However, I'd recommend that you add Cliff Edwards back in, as he is one of the earlier performers of the song, and is one of the most notable 1920s and 30s crooners, even though he is most known today as Jiminy Cricket. For what it's worth, this is not the artist I added to the list. Thanks! 78.26 (talk) 03:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)