User talk:TheOnlyBrandon

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Dueling Dragons, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Dueling Dragons
Greetings ... as to your most recent edit summary on the article for Dueling Dragons, I would actually be inclined to agree with you. Even if using the "good-faith" selection, the "undo" command would have been a better choice, and for that, I will apologize. All that said, let's get to the core issue with your edits to this article.

To the best of my knowledge, and that provided by reliable sources, the attraction is still named Dueling Dragons. Nobody is questioning that the attraction will eventually be renamed Dragon Challenge in order to fit within The Wizarding World of Harry Potter. Changing the term "would" (which, in this context, means they announced future plans at that time in the past) to "definitely will be" is bordering on argumentative, and is unnecessary because, again, nobody is saying it will not be.

When Universal officially changes the attraction's name, which will probably take place in the next couple of months, then the article will be moved to its new name, the text in it will change, and the basic order will be reversed, with the previous Dueling Dragons theming becoming a subheading in the new Dragon Challenge article.

I think you are working in good faith, and that there can be a compromise in this. Of course, when the name change occurs all this becomes moot, but still. Please feel free to discuss here or on the article's talk page. Thanks.

--McDoobAU93 (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)