User talk:ThePariahOne

Welcome

 * Thank you very much sir! ThePariahOne (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

My talkpage
The user had apologised profusely; more profusely than was needed, I think. They didn't need to be told again. They are currently blocked, anyway. My edit summary when I removed your comment explained why I did it, which you could check in the history of the page if you were curious. In future, if someone removes one of your comments from their talk pages, it's probably best to just let it be. Happy editing. OohBunnies!  (talk)  08:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

No offence but I just though I was doing the right thing. I didn't mean any insult to anyone. That's why I just wanted to ask why my comment was removed from the talk page. Still thanks for informing me. Happy editing. If I could then I'll like to ask a question. I saw on his talk page that he was blocked because he was constantly creating an article again and again that was deleted by a consensus. Why was he blocked for such a simple reason? ThePariahOne (talk) 08:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Reading over his talk page myself, it's clear that it's not so simple as just being blocked for creating the article. He was given a final warning against repeatedly creating the article (repeatedly recreating content can easily be disruptive), and instead of agreeing to stop, he threatened to carry on, under another account if necessary. So basically, he threatened to continue disrupting, even if blocked. Then he requested an unblock, but the admin that reviewed his request noticed some rather bad personal attacks, which are not allowed here. So that's two counts of breaking the "rules", and explains why he is blocked and explains why his requests to be unblocked have been denied by admins. I hope that makes it clearer for you. OohBunnies!   (talk)  10:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry I didn't see that I just read his unblock requests. He shouldn't have made personal attacks although if he would have been permanently blocked for just trying to creating an article I probably would have protested in his favor and appealed to get him unblocked. But he crossed the line when he made personal attacks. One last thing. I read through the revision history of your talk page and I saw when he asked why his comment was deleted you told him, "Please don't be angry" . Also due to you're other comments I just want to know if you had feelings for him or did you like him. That man really looked like he had a lot of problems. Look please I know I shouldn't say this, it's personal and I'm probably dropping myself to his level by asking you this on Wikipedia but the thing is I know how it's like when someone you care about gets shunned away from everywhere. It's really traumatic. My GF has cerebral palsy. She's beautiful but because of her disorder no one talks to her. I feel really sad for her because of this and sometimes it hurts me more than it hurts her. He might have had the same problems. From his comments and no offence but looks like he suffered from anxiety, depression and paranoia. That's why if you want to open up about this to someone you can. If not then it's fine it's no problem, I can understand it. I just hope you or anyone else doesn't get offended by my comment. I'm writing this on my talk page so you don't get embarassed as you're talk page would probably be widely read by other users but not that of a new user. If you want me to remove my comments I'll remove them it's no problem at all. Thank you. Happy editing. ThePariahOne (talk) 10:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If MegaCyanide666 had just created an article once then I, too, would've been there protesting his block, but that wasn't the case. He was repeatedly recreating it when the consensus was for it to be deleted. Around here, consensus is everything when it comes to content. If the consensus goes against you then it's better to try and accept that with good grace. MegaCyanide666 didn't do that; instead he ignored the consensus and repeatedly recreated the article. In the process of doing that, he created work for other people - people had to tag the article for deletion, an admin had to then delete it, and people spent their time trying to explain to him why he couldn't do that, but he wouldn't listen. Do you see why repeatedly recreating deleted content is a problem for everyone?
 * As for the other matter, it's kind of you to think of it that way, but I've barely interacted with MegaCyanide, so I certainly don't have any attachment to him. My first ever comment to him was a warning about his personal attacks, so I don't know what prompted him to leave the original message on my talk, and I won't really bother to think about it. My response to him was meant to be more polite and non-bitey than anything else. He might well have some mental problems, but it's considered a little improper to speculate on the mental health of another editor. I know you were just being honest and not cruel, but other people's health is an issue best left well alone here, unless they divulge the information themselves. :) OohBunnies!   (talk)  10:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think it was his fault entirely. I've checked his talk page and you'll like this I found that he had a fall out with a user called Niemti Template talk:Castlevania series as consensus went in MegaCyanide666's design of template. He said Niemti was bullying him. Niemti left premature block warnings on his talk page but he didn't even knew anything about edit warring back then so I don't think he deserved any block warning. Also the consensus about the template design went completely in his favor about splitting Lords of Shadow series from original Castlevania games. The funny thing is Niemti asked him to change his user name just because it had devil's no 666 in it. So what many people use 666 in their name to show off. 666 doesn't means he's being racist or fanatic. Also Wikipedia is uncensored so we all have got the right to keep what ever type of name anyone wants. Probably Niemti was really bullying him. I think if he really had depression that's what ticked him off and nobody came to stop Niemti from bullying him. I don't think it's his complete fault that he started attacking other users. It's probably Niemti who ticked him off. Niemti himself has got blocked twice and his account is a sockpuppet. But MC made personal attack which well doomed him. It probably not his entire fault he is the major defaulter but not he complete defaulter. Also I witnessed User:Boing! said Zebedee write on his talk page "just close your browser window and you're gone!". This is really a hate comment and bullying. Nobody deserves to be insulted like this no matter what they've done. If you can then please join in me protesting this so as to remove this comment. This is actual bullying. Nobody deserves this. It should be removed.
 * As for your case it's probably because he felt he had no one. That's what normally depressed people feel. Maybe that's why he said it to you because you were polite and kind of him. I can't think of any other reason than that. Funny I don't know why I'm defending him I don't even know him. It just pricks my consicience. I imagine the pain he would have suffered. I don't think he has mental problems though. I think he's depressed,alone and this often results in the patient becoming paranoid. He just wants to talk to someone who understands him. My dad's a psychiatrist that's why i know that.  I just hope this will clear his name to a little extent. Thanks. ThePariahOne (talk) 15:58, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi. I totally agree with you, ThePariahOne. My dad's a teacher, and he has a kid like that at his highschool. That kid, he's in counseling, but I heard that this one time, he almost punched the stupid counselor. He got kicked out of the school, and that couldn't have helped much. If you're kicked out of something, it doesn't feel good. I think he's currently in a "special" school. I hope he's getting better. icycoal--cognative distortion (search it) (talk) 18:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Huh!!!??? Ok well which kid you're talking about? The kid you referenced earlier in your comment or MegaCyanide666. And by the way I talked to Ooh Bunnies because MegaCyanide666 liked her in some way probably. If he's indeed depressed then it wasn't his fault that he flew into rage when Niemti gave him block warnings. ThePariahOne (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * And I'm not so much worried about him because he has mental problems. I'm worried that this incident might have made him go to extreme depression one of the major causes of suicide around the globe. I fear if he's taken such a extreme step to escape his troubles although even if he would be alive I don't think he'll be alive inside at all. Such kind of incidents can even leave a totally sane person hollow from the inside. ThePariahOne (talk) 18:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Keep in mind that I've already had to block this user as a block evading IP after leaving messages on my and Boing!'s talk pages. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 22:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a sockpuppet of MegaCyanide666. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * See for starters.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 12:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't have the ability to check technical evidence, but the behavioral evidence is compelling - you register your account the morning after MegaCyanide666 has talk page access revoked, with a name suggesting you are not welcome, and in the short time since you edit the same articles, get yourself involved in MegaCyanide666's discussions on other talk pages, and post in a similarly belligerent and angry style. If you want to further appeal against your block, you need to do so according to the instructions at User talk:MegaCyanide666 - which means using the Unblock Ticket Request System, seeing as talk page access has been revoked there. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see even half of a proper reason over here of me being blocked. I register the morning after a user gets blocked, i involve myself in other user's discussions. Tell me Boing! said Zebedee is this even any evidence at all. The next thing that I've been told about is that I've posted in an angry way. I'll like to know when I have been angry with anyone. Even when a user deleted whole of my edit on an article I didn't say anything and politely asked them to notify a user before reverting their edit and I also didn't even touch the article afterwards. I just let the article stay in it's original state until consensus by the community is reached. If you don't believe you can check the talk page of Darksiders II article. Also how am I behaving the same way as that man. As far as I know he lives in India and I am a Britisher and I've been polite to everyone. And I didn't anger at you I just politely asked you to take down those comments and I even told it was no threat it was a request and if you did not I would have to inform other admins of this behavior. I just pitied that man. Nobody deserves an insult like this. I do not see any angry comment at all. And my name? Tell me, please is this a joke? Because if it is then it is certainly a really bad joke. My name is ThePariahOne because one of my favorite movies is the 2011 film Pariah. What I think is I've been completely misunderstood over here. I hope things have been made clear and you would unblock me keeping the image and rules of the Wikpedia in mind. And also I have a favor to ask of you. My examinations are going on. So I can't keep requesting you to unblock me again and again. I request the admins to please quickly reach a consensus and lift the block. As for the unblock template I understand I won't misuse it. Thank you. Happy editing. ThePariahOne (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2012 (UTC)


 * What is this now another one of you're evidence. I don't think my editing skills that high level and besides I've got an iPod it automatically corrects everything I write. Please let me ask you are you even thinking clearly about my request. Now let me show you some evidence. Boing! said Zebeeda also has the some similar contribs how can you say he or even you I'd not a sock. I aint blaming anybody here but you didnt even understand my request. You've probably just seen that I've requested unblock and declined it without even probably taking a single look at it. Please review instead of just declining it straight away. I've spent hours to correct my editorial skills and I always use my iPod while editing to minimize mistakes. I don't think there's any compelling evidence left for this talk. Now is there anything else you want to know I'll be happy to tell. Have a nice day. ThePariahOne (talk) 22:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could tell us how you discovered the other user and his edits? I know it was quite a while after I signed up before I started getting involved with other people's edits. I will say you do seem to be polite to people, and I hope you'll be polite in your answer to a nosy question here. Were you born and educated in the UK? Peridon (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yup but I don't think that has anything to do with my block. And don't worry I know why you're asking. But I won't write it here. Don't worry I don't blame you for it. You're just trying to follow the rules of Wikipedia which is good. If I was in your place I would have done the same.  I got unblocked without notice or without any reason. I've requested them again to unblock me. Think I'll have to wait before I can start editing though. As for the user I discovered him through Template:Wasteland series. He seemed quite a bit angry that's why I started reading actually stalking his talk page as I got concerned over what he'll do. But he's not the first person I've seen with such behavior. As for the edits and intersecting contribs I don't know anything about that or how it has accused me of being a sock. Thank you. ThePariahOne (talk) 21:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Re being polite - I don't think this really fits that description. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Pssst!Haha look at you this does not fit the description. Maybe you didn't even read my comments clearly. If I wasn't polite then why would I have requested you in the first place to remove such a comment. What I said wasn't wrong at all because what you said wasn't out of the line but if I'm mistaken then I apologies for it. I was trying to save a fellow user from embarrassment. Besides the other admins would only have removed the comment. Sorry I did not read the talk page completely and I blamed you for the other one but of you think my words were harsh then I'm sorry it was your own mistake. The reason I'm banned is because I'm accused of sock puppetry not my behavior. So please just stop showing me I've done that and that. I'm only falsely blamed for being a sock. I never meant it as a threat or abuse to you I just did what was right at the moment. I request you to kindly review my unblock request. Even if you do not then I understand because youre not sure whether I'm real or not. I don't blame you for it. I understand you're doing what's in the interest of the encyclopedia. Still if you read my request maybe you'll understand that I'm an original user. Thank you. Happy editing.
 * You don't have an outstanding unblock request for me to review - it has already been reviewed by someone else and declined. But even if you should make a new request, I feel I should recuse myself from reviewing it as your accusation against me at User talk:MegaCyanide666 probably makes me WP:INVOLVED, and I think I should not use any admin tools here. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Keep in mind that I've already had to block this user as a block evading IP after leaving messages on my and Boing!'s talk pages. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 22:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry Boing! but I didn't understand what outstanding unblock request means please explain it in plain words. Also I've already provided enough evidence that I'm an original user. And I just hope you understand I never meant any disrespect I just couldn't see someone insulted like that. Thank you for considering my request though. I appreciate it. Thank you very much. ThePariahOne (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, you make an unblock request - at that stage it is open and you'll see it coloured blue. If someone accepts it they'll unblock you and mark the request as accepted, and it will be coloured green. But if someone declines the request, they will mark it as declined, turning it that sort of orange colour - your last request was declined by Anthony Bradbury, and says at the top "This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request", thus closing it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

I want to tell a truth though I actually emailed that user to secretly help me as an IP address so he won't get caught up in this conflict snd get harmed. I'm extremely sorry for that. ThePariahOne (talk) 23:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you said that. User:MegaCyanide666 doesn't have email enabled here at Wikipedia, so you couldn't have emailed him through here.  Again, CU has already made a determination above,  and I'm trying to figure out why I haven't blocked your talk page access, since WilliamH (the CU) already said you must log into your main account to request an unblock. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 23:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Tell me isn't enough just enough I didn't even email him and I know he does not have email enabled because if a user does it shows up in the toolbox. And basically I didn't even say who I emailed. Look at you. Is this what you are. Always trying to find the fault of other people. Are you just come with your baseless so called evidences. And please tell me what entitles you to remove my access from my own talk page when I have strictly staleys within Wikipedia rules and there is no evidence at all to support the block against me. Do you wanna know something else. I'll tell you just one plain thing now. I have supported the truth my whole life and sooner or later I'll get unblocked by other admins because your do called evidence is baseless. I think I've been completely polite with you but even politeness has its limit. I want to you just please review by unblock request once again. I've given all the evidence against you're block and proven myself to be true. Nothing you say will change it. I'm sorry to say Dennis but I don't think you are being impartial here at all. If you can't then I politely ask you to think with logic and rationale and clearly. Thank you. ThePariahOne (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * What, now you're claiming you emailed a different user and not MegaCyanide666, but who just happens to be editing from the same place as MegaCyanide666? You never knew MegaCyanide666 before you came across him in this case, but you happen to know another editor who lives nearby? And that different editor (who is not you and is not MegaCyanide666) said "im not a sock", when nobody has accused them of socking? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes and you already know it was me. I'm sorry I must have told you that. But I was just scared that you'll use it as a false evidence against me. I had to do it because you people weren't reviewing my unblock I didn't have time do I had to call you for help as an IP address. But still it has no impact on my case. I'll get unblocked now or someday I'm sure of that because you there was nothing to begin with. And don't I recall you saying you won't involve yourself anymore why are you here then. Look I want you to understand that Im just here to help everybody in the best way I can. And I helped that man. If you don't want to unblock me it's fine since you arent sure. But I just hope you stop bringing the baseless accusation of what I did and did not. I tried to evade the block that was my fault and I accept it. But I had to call you for help and you understood that I needed help although you knew it was me. It's a great thing and thanks. But tell me is even you're behavior with me ideal. I'm given no notice but blocked baselessly. Then you keep bringing up my behavior when it had nothing do with it and it was completely in line. That's far from ideal and gives you no right to judge my behavior. I did the correct thing. Rest is you're choice what you wanna do because I'm literally exhausted. I've been typing for hours and it's midnight and my exams are near. I can't keep on typing please understand. I've never even written so much This is many times more the edits I've made on Wikipedia. I've already proved myself just but I've no time for dealing with you're baseless accusations and evidences. Tell me do you even have any care for others are you blinded by yourself. ThePariahOne (talk) 00:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You see, that is the problem. And we won't use it as false evidence, but instead as true evidence, which is why I blocked the IP about 30 seconds after I saw it, since it was obviously you/mega.  And it has every impact on your case, because that means you were block evading.  And "you aren't sure" isn't true.  We (and I do mean we) are pretty confident you are the same person as the IP and Mega.  And now you keep saying you were blocked baselessly, even though a Checkuser connected you, after behavioral evidence did as well.  I'm glad you admitted it was you socking as the IP (although we already knew that), and I will leave blocking your talk page access to another admin, but will just say in advance that I support it if another admin is so inclined.  This conversation is no longer serving a purpose.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 00:23, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Wow anything else comes to you're imagination. Who knows I'm Queen's descendant. We basically knew you were basically blinded. You wanna just unjustly block me cause you think I'm uh somebody else go ahead do it. I don't think your reputation gonna be much after you do. And now please wait till we come up with another useless for keeping you blocked because we think you're somebody else. Look I won't talk with you or anyone else now. I had enough of taking this baseless stupidity. You're not even listening to a word I'm saying so there's only time wastage trying to make you see the reason. I proved the truth much before you started lying. I did not want to say this but you're just blinded by your ego. But you know already that I am true. Do what you want. I don't care. I'm not talking anymore on this topic because I'm really busy. I just hope you understand everything. Take care. But please just make sure you read this comment carefully before doing anything. I'm sorry I couldn't make you couldn't understand anything at all. ThePariahOne (talk) 00:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at . — Berean Hunter   (talk)  01:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Soetermans. T / C 09:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)