User talk:ThePhantom65

Speedy deletion nomination of Rita Sanders Geier


A tag has been placed on Rita Sanders Geier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/94/644/602579/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mcampany (talk) 04:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Reply
Otherwise looks OK, good luck Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:27, 14 April 2020 (UTC) Hi. Thanks again for all your help. I moved the page but am still seeing redirect on my Sandbox page. Can you help me remove that? ThePhantom65 (talk) 16:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I made these edits, mostly minor, but please check.
 * Brown II, M. Christopher; Dancy, T. Elon seems to lack a page number
 * Several paras are unreferenced. Most don't look particularly problematic, but if you could add refs that would be good.
 * Earwig scored 34%, which isn't dreadful, but it's almost entirely due to the close paraphrasing of Geier was born in Memphis, Tennessee, in 1944 to Edwin and Jessie Sanders. Her father was a Methodist minister, and her mother taught public school. In the course of Sanders's ministry, the family moved to several cities in Arkansas and Tennessee. In 1961, Geier graduated from the segregated Melrose High School in Memphis. to the source's Geier was born in Memphis in 1944, the second of Edwin and Jessie Sanders’s three children. Her father was a Methodist minister, and her mother taught public school. In the course of Sanders’s ministry, the family moved to several cities in Arkansas and Tennessee. In 1961, Geier graduated from the segregated Melrose High School in Memphis., so it would be good to tweak that para a bit

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee L. Clayman (April 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dee L. Clayman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dee L. Clayman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dee_L._Clayman Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dee_L._Clayman reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC) Hi. Thanks for the feedback. I made inline citations to the sections you noted. Please let me know if you have other concerns that should be addressed. Thanks again. ThePhantom65 (talk) 02:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee L. Clayman has been accepted
 Dee L. Clayman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Dee_L._Clayman help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:02, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:GhostDust&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/GhostDust. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I'll add, for the benefit of the next reviewer (should another unblock request be forthcoming), that this user has not addressed the connection to the other accounts in the SPI case. They have all been editing from the same device. Girth Summit  (blether)  19:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)