User talk:ThePinkBran/sandbox1

Review
Hi! I liked the story and you have done great work to improve this article. Sadly because it is a story i can not help to improve the content of it :)

Here are a few recommendations I would make - add a heading -explain the purpose of the story -add citations as to where you got the story - there are a few spots where the wording is a bit funky - also a few spelling errors

overall just read it through again and adjust it so it would look better in wiki :)


 * Jwiechjacob thanks for your review and suggestions. Would you be able to give specific examples of the funky wording and spelling errors to help the author? ThePinkBran it's true that it is hard to give feedback on a story, and you should really try to condense this story - remember, wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a repository of stories. So, you want to give your readers summaries of the myths and provide additional references to sources that discuss your particular figure, and they can further research the topic given the tools you've provided. In the citation you've used for this story, does the author provide additional context? Reasons why this story is important, historical details, how it developed, or how it is told today? This is all fair game to include in order to improve the entry. So, condense, format, and add more info - those are your next steps. Work hard, I'm looking forward to seeing how this turns out! Gardneca (talk) 02:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)