User talk:ThePointblank/Archive 3

Naomi Oreskes
I suggest that you look more deeply into the specifics. If you have any comment to make on the reverts, then state them on the Oreskes talk - or if i've made a mistake - then please state these on my talk.

From what i can see - i've reverted several insertions of POV that broke several wikipedia guidelines, and i did so each time with specifics on why they were reverted. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 11:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Please be more careful before suggesting that new editors 'ignore all rules' and in particular, ignore discussion. It is not helpful to the article nor is it helping the new editors that are concerned about them. It can be very disruptive. Thank you. -- Apis ( talk ) 08:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

It might be worth noting that the page got locked for edit waring a few hours later. I don't disagree with wp:iar in general, but perhaps the timing was a bit off? -- Apis ( talk ) 13:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:TALK and WP:SOAP
Please read the, here is the relevant section (emphasis mine):
 * Never edit someone's words to change their meaning. Editing others' comments is sometimes allowed, but you should exercise caution in doing so. Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:
 * Deleting material not relevant to improving the article (per the above subsection #How to use article talk pages).
 * Removing personal attacks and incivility. This is controversial, and many editors do not feel it is acceptable; please read WP:ATTACK#Removal of text and WP:CIVIL#Removing uncivil comments before removing anything.
 * Removing personal attacks and incivility. This is controversial, and many editors do not feel it is acceptable; please read WP:ATTACK#Removal of text and WP:CIVIL#Removing uncivil comments before removing anything.

The comment was in breach of both of these, and thus very much in accordance with the guidelines to be deleted. If you sympathize with the users POV - then i suggest that you educate him on Wikipedias rules - so that he doesn't get more inappropriate comments deleted. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhaps its time that you insert yourself as a friendly wikipedia guide for User:Grazen and help him understand the ropes? It would be much appreciated. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The Oreskes Debacle
Thanks for your work trying to quell tempers and get things back on track. I first heard about it in the newspaper. When I popped over to the wikipedia page, I saw alot of personal attacks and POV-pushing. Hopefully people will be able to put aside their animosities and get to some kind of consensus. 131.96.91.129 (talk) 18:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Meetup
– thedemonhog   talk •  edits  06:20, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

C-130 J
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:World_operators_of_the_C-130J_Hercules.PNG this image is wrong Poland will use older C-130E as part of military aid from the US Goverment. Mieciu K (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Hockey captain templates
I'm doing TfD right now, I'll add it to my list. Thanks for the heads up. Cheers, RyanGerbil10 (Kick 'em in the Dishpan!) 03:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Trevor Linden
While the current format is good now, I just have comment about what it was like previous. As far as I can tell, the images followed all WP:MOS regulations, with the first image on the right. The second one, not being under a heading, wasn't an issue with that. Again though, this current format works, I just don't totally fully understand the image policy. Kaiser matias (talk) 04:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Segregator123
Not only in the C-802 page but he also deliberately introduces wrong facts to the PL-12 page. He may also own a sock puppet who I belief is User:Proelitez. Please take appropriate action. It seems like Wikipedia is being comtaminated with factual errors. --60.50.70.65 (talk) 12:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If you feel that someone is using a sockpuppet, please report it to WP:SUSPSOCK. Thanks. ThePointblank (talk) 00:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)