User talk:TheQuandry/Archive/2007 June

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Chicago Landmark Stubification
I am writing you because you either (1) edited Chicago Landmark 5 weeks ago when it was the WP:CHICOTW (2) edited it or created a stub last week when we had the stubification drive for it or (3) you nominated an article to be the CHICOTW in the last few days.

I have finally had a chance to take a tally on last week’s stubification effort. Based on my manual count we now have 109 bluelinks on a total of 241 landmarks. Preliminary indications were that for our article to be successful at WP:FLC we would need to eventually rename it (something like List of Chicago Landmarks) and get the majority of the landmarks linked. Based on my cursory count we need to write 12 more articles to get to a majority. It would be great if you might be able to assist by creating a couple stubs to assist in this effort. Here are some of the stubs that were created during last week’s efforts: Black Metropolis-Bronzeville District, Historic Michigan Boulevard District, Arthur H. Compton House & One North LaSalle. Among the articles still redlinked are 2 buildings on this week’s CHICOTW, Magnificent Mile (Perkins, Fellows & Hamilton Office and Studio, Woman's Athletic Club). Recall that each redlink on Chicago Landmark has a footnote to a reference that gives you enough info to create a stub. If you create a new stub please add it to WikiProject_Chicago so that we can keep track of the progress. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

CSC TFA
Did you see Campbell's Soup Cans on the main page last week as the WP:TFA? Thanks again for your help. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 15:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

CHICOTW
Thanks for your nomination. Your participation here would be welcome. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

John Bender image
The image of John Bender on the Judd Nelson page is intended to protray Nelson in the role of Bender, as specified by the text right next to the image. The image of Nelson in the role of Bender can only be replaced with another fair use one as filming of the movie ended some time ago and the character of Bender does not actually exist as a living person. TheQuandry 19:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Since the character's article already contains the image, and the the actor's article links to the character's article, do you believe we need to repeat this unfree image in both articles? Shouldn't we try to keep unfree material usage to a minimal?


 * Also, I believe infoboxes in actors articles are supposed to contain images showing how the actor looks like. I don't think it's appropriate to use images of characters there, specially unfree one.


 * What do you think? --Abu badali (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)