User talk:TheQuintessentialGambini

File permission problem with File:Keith Moss - What Eludes You Moves You.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Keith Moss - What Eludes You Moves You.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: What Eludes You Moves You (August 29)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 17:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith Moss concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith Moss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/What Eludes You Moves You concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/What Eludes You Moves You, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi HasteurBot, and thanks for your message.

I haven't edited the article to which you refer since it was rejected, as there is nothing I can do to make the subject fit your criteria any more than I already have done. The article in question took three solid days and nights to create and even after complying with the rules on providing a multitude of inline citations and references, it was still rejected, as far as I have been able to tell this is because the artist in question didn't have a worldwide fanbase of millions or something. Other than myself physically buying millions or many thousands of copies of said album which is obviously impossible, I cannot do anything to make the subject any more noteworthy. So you can delete it all you like, but I'm not spending any more time working hard on something only for it to be rejected again for no reason. The bottom line is this: the album exists, I've been 100% truthful and verified all the content with references.

There was also a bizarre separate issue with the cover (artwork) of the album - I followed all the correct procedures in having a copy of the artwork uploaded but it was rejected because I couldn't prove that I had the permission of the copyright holder - even though I am the copyright holder (and obviously I gave myself permission)! I took the photo, I designed the cover etc. I went through the various channels on Wiki and though the people were understanding, the bureaucracy or whatever it is proved an impossible hurdle to overcome (they said "I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license". Whatever that means).

I know you guys have to work to ensure that the integrity of the site is upheld and to guard against incorrect information being made available etc but with rules and regulations that are so completely (and in my view, wholly unfairly) stringent and prohibitive, such as in this instance, it's no longer anything but counter-productive and pointless for all concerned.

Best wishes, The Quintessential Gambini

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/What Eludes You Moves You


Hello TheQuintessentialGambini. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "What Eludes You Moves You".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Keith Moss page blanking
Hello, I'm Dl2000. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Keith Moss. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dl2000 (talk) 13:13, 4 June 2021 (UTC)