User talk:TheReal3G

Recent edit to Alfonso Ribeiro
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! - Camyoung54   talk  02:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Bethany Mota
Please stop adding unsourced information to a biography of a living person. The article is currently semi-protected due to this, and if you continue to violate our BLP policy, you may face sanctions. In addition, please do not resort to personal attacks to. A discussion on the talk page has already begun, and you are invited to contribute there. If you continue edit warring, you will only be blocked for violating the three revert rule. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Bethany Mota. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 22:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)