User talk:TheRealCanadian71

February 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kanye West, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me!   21:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * As I said there is a discussion on the talk page Talk: Kanye West feel free to add to the discussion there. StaticVapor message me!   21:57, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Mia o w   21:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Taylor Swift. Please do not make changes to that image without discussion on the talk page Breawycker (talk to me!) 19:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Re:Taylor Swift
Where did you state why you changed the image? If I consensus was reached or it was approved, then I will retracted my warning. Thank you. Breawycker (talk to me!) 19:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)I changed it because it was more recent
 * Had you not removed it you would have seen this: "Don't edit without discussing at the talkpage" next to the picture. Breawycker (talk to me!) 19:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Black Kite (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Photo Switches
Hi,

Please read this guideline here. If you make an edit, (like for example changing the photo on a bio) and it is reverted by another editor, it becomes your responsibility to "take it to talk". You don't repeat your edit and demand that they "take it to talk".

This is why you are getting all the above warnings for edit warring. If you believe your edit improves the article, explain this on the talk page and reach agreement with other editors first.

Hope this helps. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:11, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Trillfendi (talk) 18:01, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

I was about to add under the block notice

 * I don't understand what it is you don't understand about how this place works. Escape Orbit's post above should have clarified things for you. Do you think you should simply be able to do whatever you want? Or is it something else? Since you seem unwilling to collaborate with others, I've had to block you from editing. As soon as we have reason to believe you'll stop being disruptive, we can unblock you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have been able to collab with others Floquenbeam as I did with Camila Cabello, I can't tolerate having a bad image put on me
 * That's your best example of collaboration? You changed an image, edit warred with someone to keep it when you were reverted, stopped only after being given a warning for edit warring, went to the talk page, said your photo was better because "she is more beautiful" in it, and when someone disagreed, you said "LOL, your hilarious".


 * Let's start here: Did you read Escape Orbit's message to you above, from last week? --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:36, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No I didn't get a chance to read it.. also on Camila Cabello I could've made a fit, instead I made it my final comment on that case. I'm sorry I'm austist.
 * Didn't get a chance? It's been there a week.  That's a shame, it could have helped prevent you from getting blocked.  Please read it now.  Do you understand it?  Do you agree to the restriction I mentioned here, where you cannot revert another editor without gaining consenus on the talk page? --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
 * But I can do edits myself tho right?
 * My intention was, you could make edits to articles. If someone reverts your edit, however, you wouldn't be allowed to revert them.  Instead, you would have to get consensus for your edit on the article talk page first. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Can I join the organization
I would like to be part of it Christopher Atkinson Johnson (talk) 07:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)