User talk:TheRealLaww

Welcome!

 * }

October 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Real Laww has been reverted. Your edit here to The Real Laww was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.Twitter.com/TheRealLaww) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

The Real Laww
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. I deleted your recent article because I'll post the deleted text here shortly. Note that I've killed the categories and language links while it's in userspace. Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  a deep commanding voice blended with catchy... with the most important ingredient Lyricism... a success deployment... were played in clubs in North Carolina and Atlanta and received some radio time in Milwaukee and various internet radio stations... was nominated as Best Male Hip Hop artist of the year in the Carolina Music Awards...  has left his mark in Durham, North Carolina... Only showcasing talent from around...  always giving back to his community through music. &mdash; it's written like a press release, not an encyclopaedia article.
 * I'm not doubting the truthfulness of your article, but it's not clear how he meets the notability guidelines. Working with notable people doesn't make him notable, nor does appearing at festivals. He may be notable, but it's not obvious why.
 * You need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts. Although you gave references, some were self-editable and not independent, some were to websites of dubious reliability, and some confirmed the existence of festivals and albums, not what was claimed about him.
 * Note incidentally that there shouldn't be any url links in the text, only in references and EL. Avoid links to YouTube and Twitter, a bot automatically removed a link to Twitter.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.