User talk:TheRealProducer

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Chris fournier
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris fournier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * It is not clear that this person meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for musicians. Notability is not contagious; that he has worked with notable people does not, in itself, make him a notable musician.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Fournier
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chris Fournier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * NN musician, article claims notability; however, no support for statements. A number of GHits for blogs, but no GNEWS hits.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ttonyb1 (talk) 02:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Chris Fournier
I have nominated Chris Fournier, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chris Fournier. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb1 (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. WWGB (talk) 00:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ''Please stop removing the AfD templates from the article. If you continue to vandalize the article in this manner you may be banned from editing or creating articles.'' ttonyb1 (talk) 00:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

This isn't vandalism. Just don't remove the AFD template. Thanks. Gimmetrow 00:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ttonyb1 (talk) 00:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ttonyb1 (talk) 00:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. I chose a 72-hour block as the longest likely duration of the deletion discussion. When your block expires, after the discussion has concluded and the article has either been kept or deleted, you may choose to make more constructive edits to Wikipedia. If you become aware of additional reliable sources that would be relevant to the discussion, you may place them here on your talk page, and, as long as they meet Wikipedia's standards, I'll add them to the deletion discussion and the article. Thank you. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Note on being unblocked
User:Gimmetrow thinks that you didn't mean to break the rules, but just didn't understand them. I respect her judgement, so I'd be happy to unblock you so you can continue working on the article- however, we do need you to stop removing the deletion template from the article as you work. If you agree to those conditions, just place your reason here to ask to be unblocked. Reviewing admins, I'm off to bed, but feel free to unblock on request from this user, and I'll have no objections. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:04, 16 June 2009 (UTC)