User talk:TheRealTerry

Could you please explain in the article why the company is notable (Sources would be good), and how the article is significantly different from the previous 3 times that is has been deleted. I am not an admin so I can't do this myself, but I can't see why the article would be deleted three times without good reason, or why you would say you were "reposting" it without a good reason either, as reposting for me implies the same article being created a second time.

I have tagged the article for deletion as not being sufficiently notable, which is why I am asking this. Logical2uTalk 21:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Surprised no one has done this before...

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!Logical2uTalk 21:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

A tag has been placed on United Systems and Software, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 14:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing those articles to my attention. Please refer back to them.  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 22:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see: WP:NOTE  Jammy Simpson |  Talk  | 22:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)