User talk:TheRedBox/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of Kampan (Quake)


A tag has been placed on Kampan (Quake), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. RA 0808 talkcontribs 02:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Kampan (book). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 06:04, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Nominating articles for deletion
Hi TheRedBox, you added an AfD tag to Kartikeya Gummakonda, but never created a discussion page. I have done that on your behalf because I agree that the article should be deleted, but for the future you will need to read and follow the steps here if you nominate an article for deletion through the AfD process. Thanks, and happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 12:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laligurans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basantpur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Laligurans check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Laligurans?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

CSD G5
Hi, please note that G5 only applies to articles created by the sockpuppet of a blocked user who was blocked at the time of the article being created, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi thankyou for the informtion as i read CSD G5 Criteria there was mention Block to so i request for deletion. Again thanks for reminding me. TheRedBox (talk) 13:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I came here to say the same thing. G5 does not apply for any blocked user. It qualifies only (generally) for users who created articles in violation of their block or ban. Most of what you've been G5ing are soft blocks, which wouldn't even remotely qualify. Praxidicae (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I got it thanks and sorry guys for inconvenience.TheRedBox (talk) 14:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Nitzschean Zionism
Hello TheRedBox, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nitzschean Zionism, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: page does not appear to be a test page, but a page copied from a user's sandbox to move to mainspace without removing the sandbox template--a common mistake for newbies when publishing their first article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 15:43, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thankyou for helping out. will take care of that in future. Sorry for any inconvenience. TheRedBox (talk) 15:47, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your edits tidying up the references on Kagoule. It was my first page creation, so I'm grateful for your contributions to improve it. Cheers, Turner Street (talk) 10:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You're welcome and Welcome to wikipedia. Feel free to edit and contribute in wikipedia. Happy editing.

November 2018
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice Inford, I usually warn them but while countering other vandalism. I can't have time to warn each and every ip's which vandal edits. And i only revert vandal by checking and confirming. I'll try to warn them. TheRedBox (talk) 13:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Reverted wrong version
Hi, I think perhaps you just reverted to the wrong version at Collar (clothing)? Easily done, I re-reverted, just letting you know why. Girth Summit  (blether) 17:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Thankyou Sumit i was about to undo the edit, sometimes ips are celever they do same edit, remove them and add again so while reverting. TheRedBox (talk) 17:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Seal of the Confessional in the Catholic Church, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 05:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not good to blank the article in the abdsence of citation. Instead of that find it out. I can see that you are removing useful details too. TheRedBox (talk) 06:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is quite necessary in this case. The claims being made were quite extraordinary and unusual. It would be unlikely that reliable sources could be collected to support those claims, but by all means, you are welcome to do so. 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 06:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


 * You're removing texts along with references which are expired but they can be added/request to add through internet archieve. TheRedBox (talk) 13:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you are talking about. Two sources are involved here: one is on Wikisource, and the other appears to be a letter to a priest on some parish website, which is most decidedly not a reliable secondary source. Neither of those are "expired" and I am not sure that you understand that the references are not so much at issue here as the bizarre and absurd "alternative facts" that have no basis in neither reality nor the sources that are cited. 2600:8800:1880:188:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 03:03, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * ANomieBOT reverted some of your wrong edits there. So, it's better to edit creating account rather than editing through ips and rather than blanking add some references too. Happy editing. TheRedBox (talk) 03:13, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Warning
Ok I stopped Ctimbacon (talk) 06:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
 * if you need any further help than ping me up. It's better to contribute than doing vandal in wikipedia. TheRedBox (talk) 06:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

49.215.129.109
Thanks for keeping the ship afloat! See User:Jim1138/Single use IP for a list of articles that I put together. I asked Oshwah for advice user talk:Oshwah Cheers Jim1138 talk 11:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notice jim & will check that out.  TheRedBox  (Talk) 12:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Minas Gerais
I have not removed any piece of information on the Minas Gerais state article. On the contrary, I inserted a reference to Carlos Drummond de Andrade. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.61.83.234 (talk) 13:16, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You're doing edit test as first of all you added the wrong infobox which was not according to wikipedia blp than you again add different person inbox which seems like a vandal. As far as i know about the article it's based on one of the state of Southeastern Brazil. But what you're doing is adding and removing infobox of a person, birth and other things which were vandal so, i decided to revert them. So, from next time please be careful while adding and removing content in pages like Minas Gerais. Happy Editing and i suggest you to create wikipedia account and edit from  wikipedia account which is far better than editing from ips.   TheRedBox  (Talk) 13:30, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Warning
If you continue your vandalism and harassment you will be banned! This is your FINAL WARNING!

And an FYI there was an Edit Summary, if you were intelligent enough to read it. Stupid troll! 210.185.163.29 (talk) 15:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

That's called countering vandalism not doing vandalism. You were blanking thr page and i was reverting that. Everyone can see through your contributions.  TheRedBox  (Talk) 18:27, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

User Concern
Hi. This is my first time contributing to Wikipedia and I'm in despair at the difficulties! I don't even know if I'm replying to your message in the right place, but thank you for your interest. I rewrote the page on Margaret Potter because there were so many mistakes in it - which publishers, readers and friends have been pointing out - that it seemed the simplest way of revising it, but you've changed the page back to the previous version. The most significant reference is actually included in the text itself: Consequences, her autobiography. At the very least, the titles of her books need to be corrected and in the right section of her bibliography. As for the rest, dates are wrong, genres are incomplete … even the Romantic Novelists' Association is abbreviated to RoNA, when it's actually the RNA. Please can my new version, which is 100% factually correct and not very different from her biography in the Times newspaper, replace it? Wikijocmep (talk) 16:10, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi first of all wikipedia is a encyclopedia. I reverted your edit cause i found that you were doing vandal by removing infobox and sone of the references and contents which were already there & yes you added some contents after removing those things but not any significant coverage. so, please follow the wikipedia guidelines or join Tea House to learn more. TheRedBox  (Talk) 00:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

User Concern 2
Will you stop reverting the page back to the incorrect form of it; — Preceding unsigned comment added by Department of knowledge (talk • contribs) 00:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

No comments as you're repeatedly removing content as vandal and edit warring.  TheRedBox  (Talk) 00:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

SPI
FYI: Sockpuppet investigations/Harrypotter1qq Jim1138 talk 01:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi jim sorry for late i found thatspi is closed as block.  TheRedBox  (Talk) 01:59, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thankyou Abelmoschus for my first Barnstar.  TheRedBox  (Talk) 04:02, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kappa Alpha Order, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. TheRedBox (Talk) 21:08, 18 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomerbuzz (talk • contribs)

Hello, TheRedBox, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kampan (Quake), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA 0808 talkcontribs 02:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion contested: Bank of Bhutan
Hello TheRedBox, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Bank of Bhutan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. —— SerialNumber  54129  21:25, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

Hey serialnumber according to copyvivo patrol i found out matching same contents which were copied from the sites and before than mine also one admin tagged G12 there. Otherthan i wouldn't risk to tag csd G12 cause i know it also affects on my wikipedia career. Anyway thanks for your help Happy editing.  TheRedBox  (Talk) 21:29, 18 November 2018 (UTC)