User talk:TheSaugatDevkota

May 2020
Hello, TheSaugatDevkota, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 11:20, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matti Mala (June 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matti Mala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matti Mala, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Matti_Mala Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Matti_Mala reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:14, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Central College of Vocational Training Pvt. Ltd for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central College of Vocational Training Pvt. Ltd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Central College of Vocational Training Pvt. Ltd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 04:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

what can i edit on this article in order to make it wiki friendly,>?

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, TheSaugatDevkota. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:03, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Better Chitwan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Better Chitwan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Better Chitwan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:13, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

usedtobecool: can we explain me, what to edit on this article in order to make it under wiki policy

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Central College of Vocational Training Pvt. Ltd, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to Central College of Vocational Training Pvt. Ltd. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC) ==

sorry i was unknown about this, I will try not to repeat same again regards Saugat

for wikipedia assistance
☎️ i need a help Usedtobecool ☎️ Hy, ma ahile wikipedia artcile sikdai xu, so malai dherae knowledge policies, rules and regulations, so malai kai doubt xa ans, dinu hola,

1) kasailai pay garerw artcile lekhnu policy vanda bahira ho? (if ho vane maile 2/3 ota company dekhya thye they claim some amount ma article lekherw post garxau vanerw)(ani wikipedia ma ni i am paid to edit vanne option hunxa{kina} hola?

2) citation ko lagi nepali artcile le hunna rw?

3) ani business ko lagi artcile lekhna mildaen? ( maile nepali rw bahira desh ko ni dherae article dekheko thye kunai ma even citation hudaen tae pani wikipedia ma hunxa, kina hola?

maile dherae search gare wikipedia policies haru but bujnai sakinxa wikipedia ko article haru so.

thanks in advance,
 * Hello TheSaugatDevkota,
 * Paid editing is not against policy, undisclosed paid editing is. Please see WP:PAID and make necessary disclosures, then you can edit following the paid editing guidelines at WP:PE.
 * I am sure there are companies/people in Nepal involved in undisclosed paid editing. If/when they are found out, they will be blocked or banned. If the subject is notable, and there is no solid proof of undisclosed paid editing, it's unlikely the article will be deleted. I patrol articles from/about Nepal and nominate for deletion which do not meet the notability guidelines whether they are from paid editor, WP:COI editors or independent good faith editors. There is still plenty to do, but rest assured, if I am able to continue here for some time to come, I will make sure to clean up almost all if not all the spam.
 * Nepali articles are acceptable as citations. Not every source that is acceptable for WP:V counts toward notability. Because Nepal topics have very low coverage online, many poor sources are tolerated, but that does not mean they can be used to support the notability of a given topic, especially not businesses and living people of dubious notability.
 * You can write articles for businesses. But businesses are one of the worst sources of spam on Wikipedia, so there is no room for compromise. They must meet WP:NORG with high-quality independent significant coverage in reputable reliable sources.
 * There are many reasons why some articles without citations may not have been deleted. They may have been missed by experienced editors. They may satisfy one of the special notability guidelines proving they are notable even if they don't meet WP:GNG. For example, rivers and mountains are almost always notable, so no one will delete them even if they have no sources. It could also be that there are plenty of sources easily accessible to anyone who tries to investigate, but no one has had the inclination to actually add them to the article.
 * Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 07:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Usedtobecool

Is there any videos or simple articles related about Wikipedia policies and guidance. because I am not understanding the Wikipedia articles.
 * That, I do not know; sorry! There is the help desk and the Teahouse where you can ask questions or seek help though. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:55, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * BTW, usually, the advice given to users who find it hard to understand guidelines and policies here is to edit Wikipedias in their own language/s. There's a bunch of Wikipedias from Nepal and the rest of South Asia. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hy Usedtobecool ☎️ How can we remove the deletion tag from Better Chitwan, Now I have add citations that was published in Ekantipur, Edukhaba, Synergy, Kalika, NarayaniOnline, OSNepal. And you can check it also. Ekantipur is the top news site of Nepal, Kalika, Synergy, Narayanionline are also best in Chitwan, furthermore OSNepal, also had published article regarding Better Chitwan. Now Is it enough to remove the deletion tag from the article?
 * No, I do not believe the topic to be notable, from the available sources. An administrator will decide whether to keep or delete the article based on the discussion at the deletion discussion page. You should not touch the deletion tags. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Central College of Vocational Training Pvt. Ltd, you may be blocked from editing. — HELL KNOWZ   ▎TALK 08:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of sockpuppetry block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Richardparker777. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mz7 (talk) 19:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Matti Mala


Hello, TheSaugatDevkota. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matti Mala".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)