User talk:TheSimpsons98

Reply
Hey, I just got a note from users BMK and MarnetteD that they are talking about us about being a user we don't even know of, can you let them know that I'm not that user and you, please? WikipediaGuy01543 (talk) 01:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

I'll do my best to let them know, have a great day. =) TheSimpsons98 (talk) 01:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, oh by the way. What to be friends too?, because I'm trying to make some friends on here ever since I joined the wiki a few days ago. WikipediaGuy01543 (talk) 01:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Of course we can, I like to be friends with you. If anytime you have a problem with something. Just come to my talk page anytime you want and let me know. TheSimpsons98 (talk) 01:37, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Your recent editing history at Lillian Disney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Roy E. Disney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:56, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ric Flair, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 02:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Adventures of Ronald McDonald: McTreasure Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Revert
Hi - I made a very routine edit to Wayne Allwine and it looks like you reverted it. I know that I've accidentally reverted some good edits, especially with the rollback function, and I figured that must be what happened here. I just thought I would touch base and ask you about it. EricEnfermero (Talk) 14:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Just so you know...
All your edits have been deleted, because they were made while you were evading a block. This is per WP:DENY. All the edits made by your other socks have been deleted as well. If you create new socks, this will happen again, so there will be no record of your having contributed to Wikipedia at, because you have been unable to do so under our rules. It will be like you never existed, unless you change your ways and start to behave properly. BMK (talk) 07:46, 26 July 2015 (UTC)