User talk:TheSunIsAStar147147

July 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Advanced Placement, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''No, AP does not redirect to Advanced Placement ‎. Don't make edits based on assumptions.'' Meters (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheSunIsAStar147147, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 17:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Warning templates
Please make sure to put the warning templates in a section that contains the Month and year, thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 00:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

ok i get it. thanks TheSunIsAStar147147 (talk) 00:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Ural-4320
It wasn't vandalism100.11.77.202 (talk) 12:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * okay. i apologize for the mistake. TheSunIsAStar147147 (talk) 14:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

re: Brooke Weston Academy (Page protection)
Continued from here.

I don't know all the ins and outs of user access levels, but I'd just wait and see what happens with the semi-protection request you submitted. Don't resubmit, just wait for a verdict. Given the level of vandalism there in recent days I'd say your request is likely to be approved, but my concern is that semi-protection won't solve the article's recent vandalism issues due to most of those vandal accounts (quite likely the work of a single individual) being close to having confirmed status, thus semi-protection might not be the most effective way to handle it.

If semi-protection is denied, go straight to ANI if the problem persists. This way an admin can block the individual accounts/users, which I'd guess will be much more effective at ending the nonsense.

If you want some free advice, avoid that article (and the accounts) completely until there's a verdict, just to avoid being dragged into an edit war. Any further vandal edits, go back and fix them after page protection when the vandals won't be able to just revert you again. SolarFlashDiscussion 00:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Leave me alone
Leave me alone ... for goodness sake, grow up.

Various editors have advised you of your damaging behaviour, to which your response has been to ignore by continuing your actions, and to censor the advice. Now, you are bleating about being left alone.

Both your actions and use of language suggest you immature, or of low educational standard.

In addition to the advice given by various editors, see a recent message you deleted, you need to consider why you are editing Wikipedia. Your pattern of edits suggests it is more for your personal reasons, perhaps a warped and vicarious feeling of power by threatening others, than for the improvement of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.124.67 (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment from another editor
Copy of a recent message from another editor which is posted elsewhere, see : '', please be extremely careful and thorough while using tools, especially if you are undoing someone else's work or issuing some kind of warning. Onus is on the tool user (you) to ensure tool is not misused, not used lazily, no knee jerk actions, no one is antagonised unduly, etc. There are more than one victims of your learning curve. Yes, I agree, time to close the issue. Seems bigger ball is in your court, perhaps slow down or stop using the tool until you learn to be more proficient.''


 * ok ok i already read it and i understood it. i promise - from now on, i will be slower with twinkle (that's the name of the tool used to revert/warn and a bunch more stuff). TheSunIsAStar147147 (talk) 18:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)