User talk:TheTRUTHcansetyoufree

May 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Anthony William, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jeb3 Talk at me here  17:49, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Further note from blocking admin: Even if the legal threat is rescinded, please review their two major edits before unblocking; there is essentially no chance this person is going to help create an NPOV article. And also a likely WP:COI, though I suppsoe they might just be a really big fan. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)



So, when it was pointed out that the content and the cited sources were all libel and that is also against Wikipedia's own stated policy, the response that you gave was simply "so what? You can't change it."

Stop yourself. We all know that Wikipedia can not be sued. Otherwise they would have been long ago. Yet, you conveniently infer that what I said about wondering how it would play out in a court of law is suddenly a "legal threat" in response to the fact that you had no regard for the law or Wikipedia's own stated policies. In fact, in this case you are working against the entire world by putting out libel as credible citations of fact in order to prevent people from obtaining the information that he ACTUALLY has said.

Can't imagine what would be wrong with that, other than, of course, that millions of people who have been hurt or at best let down by the medical establishment and monied interest groups that control the industry might actually also be able to finally find the truth and heal. As millions already have.

So how in the world do you support putting up that libel against your own policies? You can't. You just do it and erase the evidence. Thanks for your service to humanity. There is no wonder we are in such dire straights. A million minions like you doing your bit.


 * Regardless of whether it was a true legal threat or not, anyone who says "Anthony William, also known as the “Medical Medium”, was born with the unique ability to converse with Spirit of Compassion who provides him with extraordinarily accurate health information that’s often far ahead of its time" with a straight face is incapable of editing a serious reference work. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Stop. You have got to be kidding. That is literally word for word the truth. Not sure what words are beyond your comprehension, but you can't seriously be knowledgable in what you are talking about nor capable of understanding fact from fiction. Especially if you've read those cited libelous sources and continue to hold them up with "a straight face."

People using such colloquialisms shouldn't be put in charge of determining what the truth is. But hey that's not how Wikipedia works is it.

The dopes who said he was a "spirit from the future" were inaccurate but that was ok? That was the least of the factual inaccuracies but that's what you are saying is ok to "say with a straight face" but saying the truth that it is a specific Spirit that is Spirit of the Most High, the living word Compassion, who sits at the fingertip of God [which is a very important distinction - it's a living word and it's a name thus it's capitalized and it's not any "spirit" which has a nebulous meaning and it's not "from the future" which is indeed really deliberately meant to sound silly], that is not ok. So .. you are the "decider" in essence and you are allowed to say what the truth is? So we should go with the dopey libelous [factual misstatement] version "with a straight face."

Best of luck to you. And again, thanks for your service.

Really what's gone on here is criminal. And it effects everyone who comes across this libel.


 * Normally I would allow you to rant to your heart's content regarding your block as pretty much no one is watching this page and its akin to spitting into the wind. Your last post, however, where you accused Wikipedians of inciting violence through disinformation, is too hateful to be ignored and I have revoked your talk page access. Any appeals will need to be made via WP:UTRS.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)