User talk:TheTigersRule

Talk page access
You have access to this talk page solely so you can contest your block. Although, frankly, you need to do that from your original account. Stop messing about. -- Yamla (talk) 14:49, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear @Yamla,
 * I apologize for my "messing about". I am trying to understand Wikipedia's policies so that after 6 months, an administrator can review my ban in accordance with WP:Standard Offer, and I might be allowed back. I understand I messed up. I vandalized Wikipedia. There, I said it. However, I deeply regret my actions, which is why I created a new account to "Start Over." On this new account (@I Love Pets 12), I reverted the vandalism I had once caused. You can look through my 90+ edits on @I Love Pets 12, in which I reverted and warned users vandalizing. I then was banned on that account, because I block evaded. I did not know that was a thing until I read WP: Block evasion. I understand, now, that I was wrong. Am wrong. Yet I am asking for a second chance. I believe that my 90+ vandal reverts show that I can be trusted not to vandalize again. If I were to be unblocked, I understand I would be on a tight leash. (Watched carefully) I know this isn't a formal unblock request, but I am begging you to consider unblocking me.   TheTigersRule (talk) 18:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * In Addition,
 * While blocked, I have found out that I can use Abuse Log to find vandalism! This is a game changer!! TheTigersRule (talk) 18:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

I won't be reviewing your block. Your actions over at User talk:I Love Pets 12 showed pretty clearly that you should not be unblocked so I firmly oppose anyone lifting the block. Again, your best bet is to take advantage of WP:SO. Six months with zero edits, then write an unblock request that addresses your blatant vandalism, bad-faith attempts to mislead, and block evasion. No sooner than 2023-06-21, and only assuming you stop editing, starting now. --Yamla (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)