User talk:TheTruth1749

February 2022
Hello, I'm Unbh. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Jenny Jones, Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Unbh (talk) 09:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Why?
But it's true. She made it very clear that's her view point. Why cover up the truth? TheTruth1749 (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * When making such contentious claims, please make sure to link them to reliable, independent sources that explicitly argue that Baroness Jenny Jones is "sexist". While the article does talk about a controversy surrounding her "curfew for men" remark, none of the citations [1 ] [2 ] [3 ] listed for the relevant section call her "sexist" in any capacity. (The first two sources are not even reliable per WP:DAILYEXPRESS and WP:NYPOST.) Thus, to describe Jones as such in the article would be WP:OR. Again, I implore you to find reliable sources, with a reputation for fact-checking, that explicitly call her "sexist", and present their viewpoints in an impartial tone. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about your own personal opinions about someone else. 〜 ‍ ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍  ‍ 💬reach out to me!・📝see my work! 11:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)