User talk:TheTruthAuditor

October 2019
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Diane Abbott. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:30, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diane Abbott. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Diane Abbott
It is entirely true. TheTruthAuditor (talk) 23:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh please. You obviously have no desire to contribute to a serious encyclopedia. If you want to write your own personal opinions about Abbott or anyone else, there are hundreds of free web hosts for you to use. Wikipedia is not one of them. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Diane Abbott
With respect, it is very well documented in national media how much disdain she holds towards the police and emergency services in general. She does not support us and it is disgraceful. I shall write a proper section for you about her controversial opinions on Stop and Search for example. Would that be acceptable? TheTruthAuditor (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * As long as the section is written from a neutral point of view and is fully cited to reliable sources. But note, your statement above: "how much disdain she holds towards the police and emergency services in general. She does not support us and it is disgraceful" shows you do not have a neutral point of view, and the use of "us" suggests you may have a conflict of interest. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)