User talk:TheWinkleInstitute

July 2014
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Eurozone crisis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ''Also, do not remove content from pages without a good reason. Thank you. '' 電子888說-TALK 06:48, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Petrb. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Eurozone crisis with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 07:44, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Euryalus (talk) 07:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * In addiiton, you have been removing sourced content from Eurozone crisis and replacing it with material from an impliedly self-published source. Please read Wikipedia's requirements for reliable sourcing, conflicts of interest and presenting a neutral point of view. Also, as your edits have been repeatedly reverted, please take the advid given by others and discuss controversial edits at Talk:Eurozone crisis rather than simply re-adding them to the article.


 * Happy to discuss if I haven't adequately explained what I see as the problems with your edits so far. Euryalus (talk) 07:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)