User talk:TheWookieWikster/The Lay of the Children of Húrin

= Instructor comments 4.21.2020 =

You've done a great job summarizing each of the articles you're including; I think you've got the meat to build a strong reception section. But so far, this is organized more like an annotated bibliography than a reception section: Ideally, you should be organizing by thematic element instead of by source.

For instance, you might have a "Name Symbolism" section that includes Ricker's points about the metaphoric names, Mitchell's point about how/why Turambar is literal, Croft's points about the name stories and synecdoche. You might have a "Fan Creations" section that includes Umbrello's work.

If you've got enough for these other sections, you might pull them out of "Reception" into their own headings (or leave them in Reception, maybe with their own subheadings). Somewhere in the reception section, you ought to have a paragraph or two summarizing the overall reactions to the work. Take a peek again at the Wikipedia guidelines for reception sections: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyediting_reception_sections

Elizabeth.f.chamberlain (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

= Peer review = Here is the link to the peer review I did! I think this is the easiest way to access it! Great job so far! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TheWookieWikster/The_Lay_of_the_Children_of_Húrin/Rebeccalj30_Peer_Review -Rebecca Johnson