User talk:The 5th Musketeer

Boris Efimov
Can you give us a source that he was actually in the army? Czolgolz 01:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * hum, in fact, i just correct the wikitable here. Dealing with this possible russian vet, you'll have to speak to user:24.151.71.246 edit who added him on this page... That's all. Bye user:Paris75000 01:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Civility
This is unacceptable. Swearing unnecessarily (even in other languages) is frowned upon. Please don't do it again. --Deskana (talk)   (review me please)  01:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


 * okay i will respect it, nevertheless, I'm a bit upset to the bahavior of the User talk:R9tgokunks moreover I'm not the first one to revert his work on the article Alsace. This last reversion was to much and i correctly accept that during the reversion I was totaly upset, but I had some reason how can people who are at thousands of miles away from Alsace to think that Alsace still is a part of Germany, or it should be?... while some others, like me, are living in this french land. user:Paris75000 01:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject
You would be interested in this discussion. Czech city under German project.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 21:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Category:Jewish converts to Christianity
Hi, I have removed the speedy delete tag from this category. As you point out, religion is a topic of hot debate. Because of this, if you think the category should be deleted, please start a discussion at WP:CFD. Thanks, Malla  nox  20:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi I'm not sure why you would say this category crosses over the private line- the information is already at List_of_notable_converts_to_Christianity which also lists people converted from every other religion. Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 21:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, for me, I really think that our religious behavior is too personnal (my french and laic education could explain it) ; but in this tiny way, it's quite hard to put it IN a encycolpedia : we do have to remind that not far from us, just about 60 years ago, it existed a legal extremist political party which for religious purposes tried to lead to death a entire race (I really hate this word, beacause for me there is only one race : the human one). To allay your fears, I really know that Wikipedia is a millions years from this situation, nevertheless, to categorize people simply according to their religious behavior could have, by implication in our international backdrop and by this particular past, a deleterious efect. For all this reasons, I was hoping to not have to start a discussion at WP:CFD. Sincerily user:Paris75000 21:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

with Palme
Hi- thanks for your message- it appears the Palme used for the Belgian awards is slightly different to the French (see Talk:Order of Léopold). Regards Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 12:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi


 * Yep you're right : in France, a palm is the higher acknowledgement for the Croix de guerre (it's mainly for heroic and single acts on the warzone) while in Belgium, their palm fot the croix de guerre meant it was awarded to a military person for action during wartime. This difference seems to be noted somewhere to draw correctly the line.


 * Sincerily user:Paris75000 12:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Raymond Cambefort
I think you miss the point completely with Raymond Cambefort. First, only France and Italy had 'time requirements' to be considered a WWI veteran. Had Raymond served for the UK, he would be recognized and honored as a WWI vet. France is cutting off its nose to spite its face. Please consider also that if he served only 2 1/2 months, well the war ended, didn't it? I think you should honor him for signing up early (i.e. before 19, age of conscription) rather than pooh-poohing his 'official' status. Note also the French government changed policy and accepted Rene Riffaud and Francois Jaffre. Plus there's an anonymous poilus or two that they don't have listed.R Young {yak ł talk } 20:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)