User talk:The 89 guy

Read this first
Deleting the comments of other users from article Talk pages, aside from removal of internal spam, or deleting entire sections of talk pages, is generally considered vandalism. Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. '''The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors. '''  (From WP:VAND). The 89 guy 08:49, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

i have added this to avoid futile arguments and potetial administrative abuses.The 89 guy 08:28, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

September 5, 2006
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Batoidea, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - unsigned message from User:Ihcoyc 12:12, 5 September 2006

Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nfitz 19:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

September 6, 2006
This is your last warning. Removing legitimate warnings from your talk page is considered to be disruption. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Nfitz 23:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

If you want to change username..
Please do NOT create a new account and then move the userpage, if you do want to change please request it through Changing username. --WinHunter (talk) 06:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

This account is to be deleted or blocked. it is futile now as i will no longer use it.89.32.1.82 06:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

September 9, 2006
User continues to blank talk page warnings. Ban of user under discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Nfitz 06:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dakara weapon in action.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dakara weapon in action.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)