User talk:The Anome/archive 5

Changing Edit Summaries?
Is it possible to change an Edit summary in the article page history? I just made a change to the Hitler page, and in the edit summary, I wrote "mother" when I meant "paternal grandmother". I know its trivial, and the edit itself was correct, just the edit summary was wrong, but is there a way to change it anyway? ChessPlayer 17:38, 19 May 2004 (UTC)


 * It's intended to be difficult to go back and change the history. Just make a trivial edit (eg add a few spaces), and add a note to this effect -- The Anome 19:32, 20 May 2004 (UTC)

Moving of Whip
Hi. Could you explain why did you move Whip to Whip (politics)? I can see any reason for that (except lots of links needed to fixed). Przepla 18:52, 20 May 2004 (UTC)


 * The primary meaning of whip is a thing you hit people or animals with. Whip (politics) is a secondary meaning, just like whip antenna. Currently, almost all of the links to "whip" are for the political meaning. Just wait a bit, and someone will come round with a semi-automatic link-fixing bot and sort the links out. It's all for the best, for the future when we have a better disambiguation feature added, and right now all the links go to the right place via the redirect. -- The Anome 19:30, 20 May 2004 (UTC)


 * I see. So after such link fixing we will move Whip (implement) to Whip? Thanks for clarification. Przepla 10:01, 21 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Yes, with references to the other secondary meanings (whip-like antennae, people who "whip" other politicians into line, etc.) in that article, so we will no longer need a separate disambiguation page. -- The Anome 10:05, 21 May 2004 (UTC)

Jewish symbols
Hey, I just noticed you created this, Jewish symbols. This page is going to be a major lightning rod, like any article about Jews. Got any stratgies for keeping it (relatively) NPOV? Burgundavia 09:21, 24 May 2004 (UTC)


 * I've discovered that we already have a much better article, Jewish symbolism, and so I've turned it into a redirect to that. There is a big fuss in Talk:Jew from someone who believes that the Star of David is offensive to some Jews, but will not be specific -- I'm trying to direct an argument about symbols into an article about symbols. Hopefully if the contributor will be specific, and has a valid point, we may learn something. -- The Anome 09:27, 24 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Having just read his comments, it appears that is probably little likelyhood of reformation (or actual effort), he just wants to gripe. Meanwhile, the rest of us get on with the task of writing an encyclopedia. Burgundavia 09:37, 24 May 2004 (UTC)

Secure operating systems
The Anome, we were in the middle of a discussion about what was the best way to move the article and preserve the point when you preemtively redirected it. Please at least read the talk page and comment there before changing an article to a redirect. Thanks. - Taxman 15:14, May 28, 2004 (UTC)

My apologies. I didn't see your discussion. -- The Anome 15:17, 28 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Ok, no big deal I guess. I'm not sure there really needs to be a separate page about operating systems that have met CC certification anyway. - Taxman 15:39, May 28, 2004 (UTC)


 * How about this: "some operating systems meet certain evaluation criteria: they can be described as security-evaluated operating systems; but this as such does not make them secure." -- The Anome 15:56, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Onion juice
Way back in 2002 you wrote in fish and chips that they were served with vinegar or onion juice. I'm sure you're right, but in my travels I have never seen them served with onion juice. Do you know if this practice is restricted to a particular part of the UK, or do you know it to be widespread? Thanks. -- Heron 22:05, 30 May 2004 (UTC)


 * I can't speak for all of the UK, but this certainly seems to be the case in most chip shops in London. -- The Anome 22:25, 30 May 2004 (UTC)


 * My local fish & chip shop gives the choice of "onion vinegar", which may be the same thing as you're calling "onion juice". It is in fact the left-over vinegar from the large jars of pickled onions that they also sell individually, and has a distinctive taste. I can't imagine that the juice from raw onions would actually be very nice at all! I prefer onion vinegar to plain vinegar, so I always ask for it, but unfortunately it is not universal. There are only two other fish & chip shops in South London that I know of that do it - most don't. I'd therefore say that it is a rarety, but an epicurean delight for those who appreciate tasty fish and chips, and a useful small cost saving for the shopkeeper! Matt Stan 17:13, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

--

When you get a chance, please see Talk:Psychohistory_%28fictional%29. Thanks, RK 03:15, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)

Tmxxine
Just as a little note, I'm in the process of moving the "wacky User:tmxxine guys" (we're actually approximately half girls, but oh well) over to blogspot as I think it is a more appropriate forum for what we are trying to do. After our initial deletion, we were advised that we could put whatever we liked on a wikipedia user page, and had done that thinking no-one would mind. yours in cheerful migration, Kaiel 00:38, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Good luck with your project. -- The Anome 07:32, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Undeletion request
Need support on an undelete. Talk:Nazism/Seperate-National Socialism I would like your support to undelete this and restore as a proper standing article. Some content was moved to the Nazism article and has been made a redirect. The Nazi article is too long. *National Socialism* was not created by either Mussolini nor Hitler and the history of its development needs to have a seperate article upon it. Please see Votes for undeletion.WHEELER 18:47, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Something about redheads
Why do you say that green is surely not the most common eye color for redheads. Please give me some proof on this at my talk page and tell me what the most common eye color you think is. User:Heegoop, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Please see my reply on your talk page, and on Talk:red hair. -- The Anome 00:11, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'm going to agree on the fact that brown is the most common eye color for redheads. In fact I have red hair and brown eyes. Heegoop 17:40, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)Heegoop

More about colors
This was not meant as a segway. Thanks for removing "ghastly colours out of table box", it looks so much better. 03:41, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Vandal
Thanks about that. The comments were very immature. I had to switch the flaccid sizes, too. Mike H 01:05, Jul 4, 2004 (UTC)

Renaming and VfD history
Thank you for the disambiguation of Spreadeagle, and for moving everything to the appropriate namespaces. One thing I was curious about -- since the text that is now at Spreadeagle (position) survived VfD under the name of Spreadeagle, should the VfD history be moved with it, maybe with a note explaining the name change? I've not run across this situation before. I'm hoping you can fill me in. Thank you. SWAdair | Talk 23:50, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Yes it should. I'll move it. -- The Anome 23:58, 10 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Is Wikipedia a cult?
Hello the Anome, do you think that Wikipedia should be on the list of purported cults? Please read this article Wikipedia:controversial issues. Thanks in advance Andries 14:54, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * No, I don't think so. -- The Anome 22:18, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Orbits
Now, where did I put that Physics 101 text book? You have called my bluff: I know what I would like to see but if it's me who has got to write it it's going to take a little time to review what I once knew. Thanks for the encouragement, I think! Paul Beardsell 13:30, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Subud or SUBUD?
Is it appropriate to get a message to you like this? I clicked on "emial this user" but got a "no email address" message. I see you're active on these matters, and I have a question: Is SUBUD an acronym or an anacronym? I would argue it's still an acronym, because SUBUD has about 12,000 members worldwide, and I'm quite sure that 100% of them could vocalize that SUBUD stands for "Susila Buddhi Dharma." If this is the case, then aren't acronyms, in general, capitalized? If so, then the title of this article is wrong. It's "Subud" and it should be "SUBUD." Does this mean that the page has to be "moved?" I'm new here, so I don't want to muck around too much. Please advise. Aloha, Aliman 06:52, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC) Aliman 01:02, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * In general, acronyms are capitalised. However, Subud appears to be a special case. A google search for "subud" shows that the common case in official Subud sites is to treat the word as a proper noun, not an acronym, whilst acknowledging its origins as an acronym. See in particular http://www.subud.org/english/english.Btalk.html . Based on this evidence, I see no reason to move the page, but I've created a redirect from SUBUD to the Subud article to help with the less-common capitalization. -- The Anome 08:39, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks for doing that (the redirect). This will be fine.  I must also say, being in Subud for 18 years, that I'm quite sure that nobody in Subud carefully thought through this issue and began representing the name in a deliberate way based on that careful thinking through.  However, like legally changing a name by the "useage" method, we'll just have to go with what's been done in the past.  (P.S.: If I send a note to someone like I did you, I'm supposed to check their "User:Talk" page for a response?)  Mahalo. Aliman 18:03, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * What I tend to do is to reply here, and drop them a note on their own page that a reply is waiting for them. You can also use the "watchlist" feature to automatically watch any page you want. -- The Anome 21:44, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Starvation economy
I'm curious as to why you removed my 'starvation economy' reference from the polyamory page. It's certainly not essential to the article, but as a fairly commonly-used name for that particular argument I thought it was relevant enough to merit inclusion.


 * If that's the case, please put it back. However, I'm unsure of the wisdom of linking the words "starvation economy" in the polyamory article, as the term is used figuratively and has nothing to do with real starvation. -- The Anome 08:52, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)


 * Hence, "This is sometimes referred to as..." But I'll try to make it a little clearer this time around. - Calair


 * The anthro term "starvation economy" probably deserves a wikidef or article. --Joe Decker 16:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Laser star hypothesis
Take a look at who the creator of that page was... perhaps the name will ring a bell. Nothing links to it, I think we can just let it sit there. It shouldn't be incorporated into a mainstream article. -- Curps 17:13, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

3753 Cruithne
Re: Earth-crosser asteroid, stating that 3753 Cruithne's orbit is « "locked" to the Earth's » is probably going too far. It is one of those horsehoe orbit arrangements --3753 Cruithne has nearly the same period as Earth, so it slowly drifts with regard to Earth (i.e., it has a large synodic period). Being eccentric, it describes a kidney-bean-shaped loop during every Earth year, and the bean drifts until it approaches Earth (every few centuries, if I remember correctly), at which point an exchange of angular momentum is undergone between the two bodies which sends 3753 Cruithne's relative motion going the other way. Now, to my point: 1) Because 3753 Cruithne crosses Venus' orbit, it is just a matter of time before Venus sends it on a different orbit altogether. 2) A large synodic period is not the same as a resonant lock. 3) There is nothing in the Earth-3753 Cruithne relation that dictates the specific orbit; you can freely change 3753 Cruithne's eccentricity (for example) and it won't matter one way or another --again, no lock.

I guess I'm hung up on the term "lock"...

Urhixidur 02:41, 2004 Aug 1 (UTC)

Perhaps "entrained" is a better word? It's the momentum exchange that I'm thinking of as the entraining process. Or maybe I'm using completely inappropriate language, in which case please correct my edit to something more sensible. -- The Anome 14:35, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Islam and clothing
Often I get all pissy and proprietary when someone edits something I've written (yeah, I know it's wrong) but in this case you did a good job. Thanks especially for finding the reference to modest clothing in the Quran.

Zora 10:55, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC) (Buddhist, but trying to be respectful of Islam)

P.S. I'm not sure that my recent article on huna is as NPOV as it could be. Have a whack at it.

Richardchilton/Hanpuk/Oyecomova
Congrats on the fast response to our old friend. FYI, see also User:Shhlomo. V V 23:39, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Can you remove Avigad Berman form the speedy deletion category
i see no reason to delete him, why did you put him there?


 * The creation of the article is controversial, and a number of things seem wrong with it. Most notably: how can there be a photograph of a fictious person? At the same time, there does not seem any reason for this person/character to be included in an encyclopedia. -- The Anome 17:27, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The photo was given to walla by someone, Avigad is a comic character in the walla website... see what i wrote now in the discussion page of Avigad Berman.


 * Okay, please direct further comments to Talk:Avigad Berman -- The Anome 17:42, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Human migration
I see that you haven't contributed to this entry since you labelled it on April 6? Can you help improve it, or does it now meet with your approval? Would you consider removing your notice or contributing your reservations to the Discussion? Wetman 18:40, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Done. -- The Anome 19:44, 9 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Zebibyte and Yobibyte
You deleted zebibyte, but not yobibyte. The Vfd template was for both articles. 66.245.78.88 00:34, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * The server was slow. I got there in the end! -- The Anome 00:35, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)

AVP
Accodring to IMDb, the Alien Vs. Predator movie has capital Vs. in the title. Ausir 10:49, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

On the official movie website, the name is either rendered "Alien vs. Predator" or in all caps as "ALIEN VS. PREDATOR", used on the movie poster (but all-caps is common on movie posters). I assume that the latter is simply the former transformed to all-caps. See the HTML title of the entry page, or text on http://www.avp-movie.com/us/html/homepage.html -- The Anome 10:56, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Seems like they're inconsistant even on their own webpage, as the "vote now" popup uses "Alien Vs. Predator" HTML title. Ausir 11:03, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Then I suggest we go with the standard formatting of "vs.", since they can't make up their minds. -- The Anome 11:11, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Why was clear plastic fetishm removed?
Why don't I see clear plastic fetishism removed? I added this on Aug 24 and I don't see it any more.

Mark Allyn


 * See Votes for deletion/Clear Plastic fetishism. After a deletion vote, the onus is on the proponents of a page to justify its restoration at Votes for undeletion. -- The Anome 18:50, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The business and economics forum
Anouncing the introduction of The Business and Economics Forum. It is a "place" where those of us with an interest in the business and economics section of Wikipedia can "meet" and discuss issues. Please drop by: the more contributors, the greater its usefulness. If you know of other Wikipedians who might be interested, please send this to them.

mydogategodshat 19:12, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Mathing
I see you're putting the epidemiology articles into nice maths (a skill I haven't acquired yet). If you're at it and you don't mind, would you do all of them, make them nice and consistent (because they've been written by different people doing things different ways). I am having a big push on getting all the mathematical definitions I need into the section so I can write an article on mathematical modelling in epidemiology, so I will keep adding stuff.

Thanks! But if you do mind, I'll do it myself, later.

--Viki 10:33, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * You can find out how to do it at the Wiki maths formatting page. Once you get used to it, it's as fast or faster than ASCII art. -- The Anome 10:35, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Disclaimers
I saw that you removed the link to other disclaimers from General disclaimer but didn't give a reason for doing so. What was it? Jamesday 04:48, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * The General Disclaimer should be just that, and not contain any other editorial material. I put the removed material on the talk page with the link to the page comparing disclaimers. -- The Anome 12:34, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Mah Nah Mah Nah (or however you spell it)
Is it too late for a Did you know...? - can't believe it has pornographic overtones! Whilst I'm here...er, have you done something with the Wikipedia logo for your talk page? Cos the strange thing about it - if it is you to blame - is that it also overlays my other IE6 Wikipedia window! Disconcerting. --[[User:Bodnotbod| bodnotbod »  .....TALK Q uietly  )  ]] 20:07, Aug 31, 2004 (UTC)

Categories.
Note: Discussion moved to Template talk:Categorybrowsebar

Small caps on categorybrowsebar
What's with the small caps? I think they're really sort of ugly, especially in my browser. AaronSw 23:13, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * What browser do you use? -- The Anome 23:14, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Nice refs in a couple of articles; I expanded hypospadias
You have put really excellent online full text references in at least a couple of the articles I have contributed to (hypospadias and sexual differentiation come to mind). I just noticed you started the hypospadias article; I gave it some expansion this week. Alteripse 02:02, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Thank you! And thanks for your work on these articles. -- The Anome 08:39, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Leotard picture
I've restored the image of the Kigurumi costume incorporating a leotard again and raised issue with its removal over at Talk:Leotard. Just letting you know in case you wish to discuss it. Bryan 18:01, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Paul Kurtz
That was not a personal attack on Paul. It was a valid criticism. When it comes to ancient history Paul is out of his field, just read his books. I can't understand you, guys. You just don't make sense. I tried to say Paul was just naive, but that was blown away. Someone likes anti-religious. I am sure you will put back the part that was my entry. Right? Charlie Turek magician  charlesturek@comcaast.net

142.177.109.56
Please see my question at Vandalism_in_progress. Thanks. -- orthogonal 14:16, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Whitening
I see you listed Whitening on Cleanup on September 10th (now at Cleanup/September), saying
 * needs fact-checking and expansion

I disagree (as I stated on the latter page): I think it should just be (after a fact-check) merged with White noise. Feel free to either remove the cleanup directive and the Cleanup/September entry or remove the merge directive (I've kept both in the article). Please let me know if you do the latter. - dcljr 21:51, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Data Management Wiki Committee
Thank you for your contribution to one, or more, articles that are now organized under Data management.

Because of your previous intrest, you are recieving an invitation to become a founding member of the Data Management Wiki Committee.

The members, of course, will form and solidify the purpose, rules, officers, etc. but my idea (to kick things off) is to establish a group of us who will take responsiblity to see that the ideas of Data management are promoted and well represented in Wikipedia articles.

If you are willing to join the committee, please go to Category_talk:Data_management and indicate your acceptance of this invitation by placing your three tilde characters in the list.

KeyStroke 01:13, 2004 Sep 25 (UTC)

Alexa reach rank measurement for wikipedia.org
If I follow the page history correctly, you started the Alexa reach rank measurement stats on Awareness_statistics. I assume, without having researched, that that's different than the Alexa traffic ranking. Can you include a link to the query used to garner the data? I'll create a chart for it soon. Also, as time passes and data accumulate, you might consider the frequency of updates as discussed on the talk page. Thanks. --Kbh3rd 03:17, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Chapman Stick page
Thanks for the correction.

Vancegloster 07:24 30 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Official invitation
Hi!

This is a message to let you know that there is now a UK-specific Wikipedia community page at UK wikipedians' notice board. It would be great if you could come and get involved! -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 23:07, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Magic Collaboration of the Week
I'm sorry to say your nomination for Harry Blackstone was removed, it didn't acquire the required 3 votes within the week after the nomination. Feel free to add it again in a few weeks, or earlier, if there aren't any other nominations ;). Michael Ammar is the current Collaboration. Happy editing! --[[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 10:27, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)

Removal of the stuffed toy image from Tin-foil hat
Can you please explain why you removed the stuffed toy image from Tin-foil hat? What problems does this image cause for people? Thanks. -- (an anonymous contributor)


 * Tin-foil hats are a deadly serious issue for those paranoid individuals who wear them; many of them are sufferers from schizophrenia, a severe mental illness. This is a serious subject, and cuddly toy illustrations are not appropriate. We can, and should, report on the mockery of the wearers of tin-foil hats that is the most common meme regarding them -- we should not, however, take part in it. -- The Anome 12:06, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Terminal Velocity of a droplet
Hi, Thank you for answering my question about how fast a raindrop falls. May I ask how you came across it?


 * Well, I know that the rain drops were going to be falling at their terminal velocity, but I didn't know how fast that was. So I converted that thought into a Google search by eliminating all but the most important keywords: "rain drop terminal velocity", and read the articles that came up. After checking that they all seem to give answers that roughly agreed with one another, I chose the one that seemed to give the clearest description of the phenomenon. Perhaps we need a page Googling tips for how to select good search keywords. -- The Anome 12:54, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your answer. Your reply is more about how to do a google search. I appreciate that. My question was more about how you found my question ;)
 * . C o A X

Arba'in
Interesting article. It looks all right to me, but I don't know much about it - not too many Shiites in Algeria, you see! - Mustafaa 23:39, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks for checking it out. -- The Anome 10:07, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

From a fan
Hi! I've noticed all your great work you've been doing, and you deserve many kudos for it :) Keep up that good work you do!

By the way, maybe you'd like to add Smith normal form to Danny's contest? I think math articles need a bit more recognition at times ;)

Thanks Dysprosia 08:57, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Thank you! However, I can't take any credit for the Smith normal form article, as it is a more-or-less direct import from a GFDL article on PlanetMath. -- The Anome 10:07, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Editing conflict?
Hi, I noticed we are working on the same article, Enfleurage, I was wondering if you are writing either supercritical or Supercritical fluid extraction at this time? (if not, I'll take a crack at it overnight) Also noticed you changed the category Perfume to Perfumery... would you think it might be a good idea to put "Perfume" in as a sub-category to perfumery? I'm still a little shaky on accepted categorization principles here on Wikipedia. Also, any other perfume/essential oils articles you are going to write? Or any suggestions for any you'd like written?. Nice to meet you.Pedant 22:04, 2004 Oct 28 (UTC)

No, I was just doodling about adding categories and doing slight copyedits. You know much more than I do about this topic. Please go ahead.

I believe that the best rules for categories is that they should either be
 * the name of a field of study, if the category members all fall under that field of study, or
 * a plural noun or noun phrase, if they are members of a class of objects that can be described as such.

So, examples of good category names are:
 * by the first rule, "Physics", "Topos theory" and
 * "Countries", "Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom", "Medical tests" by the second rule.

It is also useful to look at an existing similar article, and see what categories it belongs to. I hope this helps. -- The Anome 22:13, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)


 * Ah. As ever, someone has already written a really good guide: see Categorization. -- The Anome 22:15, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)

Oil price graph
Thanks for your compliments! But I'm going to have to decline to recreated it as a logorithmic chart or with a base of 0. The graph would lose some of its sharpness that way. Thanks though! – Quadell (talk) (help)  20:26, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

K.F.
All of your redirects and deletions are resulting in double and triple redirects. Can't you leave them alone? RickK 00:54, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

I'll do some cleaning up. -- The Anome 00:57, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

I caught one I'd missed. Thank you. I seem to have already got most or all of the rest prior to reading your comment. -- The Anome 01:03, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)

Missed message
Sorry for missing your message on IRC - I'd wandered off in frustration at the general slowness. Perhaps tomorrow will be a better day. Regards -- sannse (talk) 19:59, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Invite
Hi

I'm posting this to invite you to participate in WP:LCOTW, a project you may be interested in. Please consider nominating and/or voting for a suitable article there. Filiocht 12:40, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)


 * I've added a pretty useful online reference to Oscar Wilde, in case you're interested. Filiocht 13:19, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)

Three revert rule
I understand but what do you do when a vandal (User:Chuck F) breaks it again and again. He has vandalised countless pages and I can think of no other way to stop him. 195.92.67.71 14:40, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * First, I suggest that you get yourself a login username, so we can more easily identify you in on-line discussions (see the link at top right of any page for the link to create an account).


 * Secondly, try to discuss the issue on the talk page of the article before making any changes, giving your justification. This makes it much easier for other people to appreciate your arguments.


 * Finally, if no consensus can be reached, consider using Request for comments, or appealing to the Arbitration Committee.


 * In general, the community tends to support well-behaved users who can give citable, verifiable evidence for their views over those users who engage in edit wars.


 * My advice to both you and Chuck F is to try to cool down over this issue, and chill out a bit: see Wikilove for more guidelines. -- The Anome 14:49, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)


 * All of that has been tried and failed. Chuck F is already the subject of a Request For Comment and he is also under a Request For Arbitration. I think he is actually starting to learn to compromise, but only because I have forced him to. I wish there had been another way. 195.92.67.71 15:23, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

A reply
sorry, i won't vandalize any more.

but i wasn't the one who put the inappropriate picture on the sandbox. someone else did that.

i like wikipedia a lot, so i don't want to be banned.

am i allowed to express angry but not overly inappropriate political feelings on the sandbox?

and sorry for putting a messagge on the wrong page.


 * Dear Anon, thanks for your reply. Wikipedia is a project to build an encyclopedia. Thus, the only thing we should do with political views is report on them. There are plenty of other Wikis where expressing your political views is on-topic: why not try one of them? -- The Anome 00:43, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

merger?
Please see Talk:Learning_disability. cHEERS, 00:50, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)Sam [Spade]

Kate Bush
sry about the pic size. I wasn't aware that there was a regulation! Does it apply to all pics, or just album covers etc? -- Martin TB 18:11, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * er, well... "regulation" was a bit of a joke/exaggeration on my part, but there is a guideline that images should be 225px wide, unless there's some special reason. It's only a guideline though. -- The Anome 18:12, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * :D I had realised that there was a convention for Album covers, and to be honest the 300 for the Kate Bush page was a bit large, but I'm biased as she's one of my all time favourite singers. Martin TB 20:17, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Mine too. -- The Anome 20:38, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)

WP:LCOTW
Filiocht 10:37, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)