User talk:The Black Sheep3

April 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Peninsula Barracks, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

The Black Sheep3, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Peninsula Barracks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Your addition to Peninsula Barracks has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''Your repeated large addition to this page is not permitted under copyright law. It has been directly copied from https://www.memorialatpeninsula.org/?p=16533 and MUST NOT BE ADDED TO WIKIPEDIA!'' Murph 9000  (talk) 19:02, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Please understand that the big, harsh, and scary messages about copyright are for very real and serious legal reasons. I do not want to discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia, it is just extremely important not to directly copy content in from outside.  In general, the only external content you can bring in is something that is 100% your own original work.  There are a variety of useful links directly above, and in the big welcome message I placed at the top of your talk page.  Those links should both help you with general Wikipedia editing, and help you learn about copyright issues.  Thanks.   Murph 9000  (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Peninsula Barracks, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. 'This is extremely important. YOU MUST NOT REMOVE THE LARGE COPYRIGHT NOTICE FROM THE ARTICLE. It has to remain there until a Wikipedia Administrator officially removes it. Also, please do not add any part of that external article directly to Wikipedia again, it is a copyright violation whether you add some of it or all of it.' Murph 9000  (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Royal Green Jackets
You have added the unsourced comment "The Royal Green Jackets have lost the copyright to the graphic design of the cap badge worn by the men who served, it is now owned by MEMORIAL AT PENINSULA LTD" three times now. Quite apart from the fact that it is extraordinary that the regiment has "lost the copyright" (because copyright of regimental insignia is owned by the Crown) the claim is unsourced and you say "this can be checked out in letters and copyright numbers all are listed with a solicitor". Per WP:CITE and WP:RS, the onus is on the editor to apply a citation, not on readers to have to contact a solicitor. You are edit warring and if you continue to edit war you may be blocked from using wikipedia. Dormskirk (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)