User talk:The Buddhism City of Myanmar

Welcome!


Hello, The Buddhism City of Myanmar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tutorial to help get you oriented editing Wikipedia)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Ogress smash! 20:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hi The Buddhism City of Myanmar, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages!

kelapstick(bainuu) 01:22, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2015 Myanmar flood has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2015 Myanmar flood was changed by The Buddhism City of Myanmar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97501 on 2015-08-06T09:54:46+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015 Myanmar flood. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2015 Myanmar flood was changed by The Buddhism City of Myanmar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959752 on 2015-08-08T04:24:31+00:00.

Your recent editing history at Aung San shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ogress smash! 05:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Ogress smash! 05:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aung San Lin


A tag has been placed on Aung San Lin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Flat Out (talk) 06:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Aung San. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bishonen &#124; talk 09:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Hey there
Listen, I am aware you are very enthusiastic, and that is great! However, you have been blocked for edit warring. I know it can be frustrating to have your edits removed, but there is a process for dealing with this situation. Perhaps you should swing by the Teahouse and learn something about the standards of reliable sourcing expected when you add information to an article: Identifying reliable sources explains it as well.

I'm adding a welcome to the Teahouse message at the top of this page and suggest you go ahead and visit it (once your block is expired) so that in the future you might be able to add valuable information to Wikipedia.

If your edits are reverted, be sure to visit the Talk page of the page you are editing in order to discuss and reach consensus with other editors. Ogress smash! 20:06, 12 August 2015 (UTC)