User talk:The Castbreeder

You're Sylvester Stallone? --Boycool (talk) 14:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Is that image really your own work? --Boycool (talk) 16:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you give me a link to the site where you got it? --Boycool (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Angel Town (1990 film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Angel Town (1990 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099039.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Town (1990 film)


A tag has been placed on Angel Town (1990 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Baseball  Watcher  23:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angel Town (1990 film)


A tag has been placed on Angel Town (1990 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Baseball  Watcher  23:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Universal Soldier: A New Dimension
Do you have a source for where File:UniversalSoldierNewDimension.jpg came from? It is unusual to have a poster image before filming even starts, and we need to be able to source copyrighted images. Otherwise, we cannot use the image. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * It looks like it is a fan poster. I will have to remove it. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 17:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Please stop restoring the fan poster to the article. It is an inappropriate image to use on Wikipedia. We only use official posters in film articles. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 13:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has strict criteria about non-free content. We use copyrighted images with great care. If we cannot, we should not use them. I understand that it is fun to put up, but we have to comply with these policies and guidelines. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 14:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

The Circuit 2: The Final Punch (2002 film)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Circuit 2: The Final Punch (2002 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0321704.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Terminator 5 (film)


The article Terminator 5 (film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Movie not yet even in pre-production, merely in development.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. E. Fokker (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Circuit 2: The Final Punch (2002 film)


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gabriele449 (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I've declined that deletion. It did look like a straight copy of IMDB which is unacceptable, but it wasn't an attack.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  22:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Terminator 5 (film) for deletion
The article Terminator 5 (film) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Terminator 5 (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. E. Fokker (talk) 23:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The Expendables 2
Hi, Castbreeder. We cannot have articles about films that have not entered production yet. We have notability guidelines for future films that say to wait until filming is verified to have begun before having a stand-alone article and to report discussion at another article. That is why I redirected to the "Sequel" section. For example, I am working on Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter and waiting for filming to hopefully begin so I can create a stand-alone article. Any chance you can do the same? Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 11:33, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That is also why people at Articles for deletion/Terminator 5 (film) are saying to redirect. It's just too soon right now. The threshold to create an article is the start of filming because it is far more likely that we will have a film when that happens. A lot of projects in development are more likely to go nowhere. If filming does begin, we can have an article for the ages. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 11:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The first film's article went through AFD at Articles for deletion/The Expendables (2010 film) and was deleted. You can see here that the article has a history of being deleted. It is good that the film was made, that means we have an article for eternity. We didn't know that at the time, though, like with the other projects in development. For example, Shantaram (film) was planned for some time but never got off the ground, so it does not warrant its own article. I just recommend working on the "Sequel" section at The Expendables and moving it to the article if filming begins. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 12:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * What about an incubated article that we can move back into the mainspace if filming begins? We can have the "Sequel" section at the first film's article that summarizes development and casting so far. For comparison, I have Article Incubator/The Great Gatsby (2012 film), which I created and plan to move to the mainspace if filming begins as planned. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 12:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

I have restored the redirect as the sensible and policy appropriate option. Since you have invested quite a bit of time in writing the article, I would not like to see you lose all of the work. Therefore I've copied the entire text to your user subpage at User:The Castbreeder/The Expendables 2. You can work on it there until the subject meets the required criteria for a stand-alone article at which time it can be moved back to main space. Big Bird (talk • contribs) 14:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of One Night (2010 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One Night (2010 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One Night (2010 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Riddick (2011 film)


The article Riddick (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Topic violates the notability guidelines for future films. Has not yet crossed the threshold of filming and is not guaranteed to. Latest news is this, which is just wishful thinking.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 16:39, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of The Circuit 2: The Final Punch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Circuit 2: The Final Punch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Circuit 2: The Final Punch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Film Creator (talk) 13:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Circuit (2002 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Circuit (2002 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Circuit (2002 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Film Creator (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)