User talk:The Channel of Random

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, The Channel of Random. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! L3X1 My Complaint Desk 03:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Admin message
Hi, Channel of Random, thank you for helping revert vandalism. If you come across an article you think should be deleted, like ALLBRIGHT 1-800-PAINTING, which is indeed more like an advertisement, please don't blank it but put a speedy deletion template at the top of the article. Then an administrator will find it, and will delete it if they agree with you. (Deleting is stronger than blanking, and only admins can do it.)

Click on the speedy deletion link to see these templates and the reasons they can be applied. For instance, in the case of ALLBRIGHT 1-800-PAINTING, you want to add the template, which will unfold into a text about advertising and promotion. Copypaste it just as it looks here in my message, with the curly brackets. Auric, who wrote to you above, has changed the title of the article to the more normal and Wikipedia-compliant Allbright Painting, but I still think it's an advertisement for a non-notable entity, and I will delete it in a minute or two. (You can see if you have time to add the speedy template before I do, if you like! :-) ) Happy editing. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC).

Blanking
Hi. I notice that at the Young Bane article, you reverted a blanking. Normally, this would be a good thing to do as blanking often equals vandalism. However, when the author of an article blanks it, and they are the only contributor of content to the article, this is taken as a request for deletion. In this case, G7 one author request for deletion is the tag to use (without reverting the blanking). Edits by others like tagging, typo correction, categories, and such, do not count as content, and removal of unsuitable content by someone other than the author is also disregarded when assessing the content contribution. If an article is later re-created and deleted more than once, admins give consideration to 'protecting' the title from creation. The more times an unsuitable article has reappeared, the more likely it is to be protected. However, an author request deletion isn't counted in this assessment - only the times it has been deleted against the wishes of the author. An author blanking their own work may remove a speedy tag, but they don't need to be warned about this as they are taken to be requesting deletion themselves anyway. Peridon (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Your warnings
Please explain how this is vandalism. --Neil N  talk to me 15:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * It just sounded like random addition. Plus, the grammar is a bit poor (notice how period is right before the beginning of first word with no space). And how there's some double spaces between some words. The Channel of Random (talk) 15:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The content fits in with the section and poor grammar is not vandalism. Please read WP:NOTVAND. I agree with your removal but please use the proper kinds of warnings when you revert. In this case, it should have been for adding unsourced material. --Neil N  talk to me 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)