User talk:The Cheeky Little Blighter

July 2014
Hello, I'm DMacks. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Nitrate because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 19:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Adele are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Please reread the above. Wikipedia is not a place to discuss fan mail. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:33, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Talk:Cheryl Cole shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Cheryl Cole. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 19:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * No, your edits weren't even the slightest bit disruptive in nature, including outright vandalism prior to moving on to basic talk page trolling. Your unblock request is disingenuous at best and belies belief.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  21:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, read WP:NOTTHEM before considering another request, because I sincerely doubt that this one will be accepted. Origamiteis out right now 01:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Origamian (talk • contribs)


 * For the record: ✅ socking via .--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:04, 10 July 2014 (UTC)