User talk:The Doctor 1170

Welcome!


Hello, The Doctor 1170, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Matthew Stovell


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Matthew Stovell, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jim1138 (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Star Five
Hello The Doctor 1170,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Star Five for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matthew Stovell
Hello The Doctor 1170,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Matthew Stovell for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Anonymouspoutateoh (talk) 14:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew's New Hope


The article Matthew's New Hope has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, nonexistent book. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Spyro's Curse


A tag has been placed on The Spyro's Curse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You appear to have created a number of pages about your own work. This is unacceptable, and all of these pages are subject to speedy deletion for the reasons listed above. —C.Fred (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from The Spyro's Curse, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Spyro Strikes Back. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Spyro's Curse


A tag has been placed on The Spyro's Curse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. In veritas (talk) 00:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Spyro's Curse, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Wikipedia is not the place to create stories written by you, or about you, or anything similar. It is not a free webhost. —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Notability
Hi! I was about to let you know about a page move I did, but I see that you've recently had a lot of articles deleted and I thought I'd explain why.

In the case of Draft:Michael Jackson & The Jacksons – Month To Month Recording Session Guide, I've left an explanation here, so I won't go into more detail here for space concerns.

Now as far as the other articles go, it looks like you were mostly posting about books that you wrote yourself. Please be aware that most books do not pass WP:NBOOK, as it's an incredibly difficult guideline to pass and until very recently, even being on the NYT Bestseller List wasn't seen as a sign of notability. Most fanfiction or autobiographies will not pass these guidelines. Other articles you wrote seem to be about things that happened to you, like a claim of a curse surrounding Spyro. This sort of thing isn't seen as notable per the site's guidelines, which are fairly strict and hard to pass.

I think that it might be a good idea for you to hold off on creating new articles right now, since I don't know that you're really all that aware of policy and guidelines. I'd like to recommend that you take one of the training programs like WP:ADVENTURE and seek out a mentor or at least go visit the WP:TEAHOUSE for advice before creating an article. Now when it comes to article creation I'd recommend that you only create articles via WP:AfC, the articles for creation process. This will give you more time to work on the article and you'd get some feedback if the article is declined, which means that you may be able to try fixing any problems. However please be aware that if you're writing about things that would not pass notability guidelines at all, the articles will not be approved.

I have to warn you: if you make a lot of articles that do not pass notability guidelines and only concern yourself, you do run a risk of getting blocked as a disruptive editor. That's why I'd really recommend that you do the above advice. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  11:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:The Doctor 1170
User:The Doctor 1170, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Doctor 1170 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:The Doctor 1170 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Karst (talk) 12:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Jacksons: Month to Month Recording Session's Guide
Hello The Doctor 1170,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Jacksons: Month to Month Recording Session's Guide for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Catmando999  Check out his talk page!  01:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spyro Strikes Back


A tag has been placed on Spyro Strikes Back requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  09:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Return of the Dragon (Matthew's Novel)


A tag has been placed on Return of the Dragon (Matthew's Novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  10:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New Hope (Matthew's Novel)


A tag has been placed on New Hope (Matthew's Novel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  10:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Explanation of why you can't make more changes to Wikipedia at present
Hi The Doctor 1170,

I'm Peter from Australia who uses the "username". I'm a Wikipedia editor and Administrator on the English language Wikipedia.

It seems like you might have misunderstood what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia on the internet.

Wikipedia is not a website to host your own writing. I love reading books and writing about them. But uploading details of your own writing is not what Wikipedia is for.

Perhaps you could start your own website for your writing? There are a number of websites that will allow you to upload your writing at no cost. Please do be careful with them, as with anything on the internet. They may collect your details (like your mobile phone number, your email address, and so on) for commercial purposes.

So far, you haven't used Wikipedia for what it is for. This is the reason I have blocked you from making changes to Wikipedia.

You have been blocked for no specific period of time. This does not mean forever. You could be unblocked tomorrow, if you agree that you will not use the English language Wikipedia as a web-host.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this, or anything else related to Wikipedia.

--Shirt58 (talk) 11:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)