User talk:The Elves Of Dunsimore

CKD Galbraith
Could you restore the original CKD Galbraith article from Oct 5 and either put it on its page, on back on the userpage of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:GMcQ that user's page seemed have disappeared. Hackbinary (talk) 15:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Please keep the discussion in one place, and refrain from forum shopping Thanks,  F ASTILY  (TALK) 20:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

The Envision Manifesto
I don't quite understand your reasoning for wanting the deletion of my page? It is not a personal essay at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleVisionary (talk • contribs) 03:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Reply: Thanks for the swift reply, but do you understand the basic concept of originality? I created this so that it could spread around the world. Its not too difficult to understand... — Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleVisionary (talk • contribs) 03:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Seeks
Hi The Elves Of Dunsimore, just to let you know that I've declined speedy deletion of Seeks. Let me know if you see a problem with this. Thanks. Beniz (talk) 09:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi again, sorry for removing the tag myself, no intention to do bad here. Now the page has been deleted ? I can't find the discussion page, I had indicated the engine was being used by Ubuntu France with more than 4M users... Is there any way to contest deletion ? Thanks. Beniz (talk) 06:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of TheGATE.ca
How do contestations of speedy deletions get handled? No one else has weighed in on TheGATE.ca and I would like to know what happens next. Any suggestions? Dustyweasel (talk) 03:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the info and tips. I'll see if I can improve the page more for notability. Dustyweasel (talk) 11:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Reggie Aqui
Hello The Elves Of Dunsimore, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Reggie Aqui, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  11:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Maa Exchange
Kamzaf (talk) 02:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Hi About the speedy deletion you put on Maa Exchange == i dont know whats happening when i type it comes on as text boxes but when i edit someone elses it doesnt Kamzaf (talk) 02:14, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Rentschler farm
Hi. Thank you  for patrollig  new pages. Before tagging new pages that  are probably  still  under construction, please take a moment to  check  for possible references in  Google -  it  may  well  turn out  that  this article will meet our criteria for inclusion. Please also read WP:NPP to  see the other tasks  you  should also  be preferably be doing  to  help  these new articles on  their way, and don't  hesitate to  ask  me on  my  talk  page if you  need help  in  understanding  anything at  NPP. happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Kaligtasan
Turns out Kaligtasan matched A10 (Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic) so I've redirected it to Salvation. - Pointillist (talk) 08:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

AfD on something you tagged for CSD
I have nominated Super Awesome Party/Conservatives only for deletion, the deletion discussion is located at Articles for deletion/Super Awesome Party/Conservatives only, I am notifying everyone in the article history. Monty 845  04:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Hello The Elves Of Dunsimore. Thanks for the speedy deletion work you are doing; it's a very important activity! I did want to let you know, though, regarding Bangladeshi Poets in Facebook, that current consensus holds that it is bad practice to tag articles for speedy deletion as lacking context (CSD A1) or content (CSD A3) moments after creation, as users may be actively working on the article content. Ten to fifteen minutes is considered a good time to wait before tagging such articles under either of these criteria. Please note that before an appropriate waiting period is over, the articles should not be marked as patrolled, so that the wait does not result in the article escaping review at a later time. Nothing here is meant to apply to any other criterion; attack pages and copyright violations especially should be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.  Cind. amuse  08:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Bookatable
Hello The Elves Of Dunsimore, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Bookatable, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 01:21, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * hi Logan, no problem with the decline, when i tagged it (about 12 hours after creation) it didnt have the refs it does now. cheers -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 01:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Johann Rall
Sorry, that should've been an inline cites banner. I've changed it. Thanks for pointing that out to me. Nightscream (talk) 04:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yong Hwa Salido


The article Yong Hwa Salido has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. N0f o rmation 02:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noformation (talk • contribs)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Meep Sheep is the best vandal
Hello The Elves Of Dunsimore. I am just letting you know that I deleted Meep Sheep is the best vandal, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool 02:40, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

CSD on The Unbeatable Maze Game
FYI...I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on The Unbeatable Maze Game. You tagged it for A1 CSD, but that is not applicable. A1 is for articles with insufficient context. The context is clear, but it's just not notable. The article is already PRODed. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:49, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

BLP PROD
Hi there, I've removed the BLP PROD tag that you placed on Gaurav kapoor because the article had references that supported some of the claims made in the article. To quote from WP:BLPPROD, "To place a BLPPROD tag, the process requires that the article contain no sources, whether reliable or not, and in any form (references, external links, etc.), which support any statements made about the person in the biography". This is an easy thing to misunderstand at first (I know I did!) and you are of course free to use a regular PROD or send the article to AfD if you believe the subject to be non-notable. Jenks24 (talk) 08:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Cheers
Thanks for the change of my article creating status (I hope it was changed as the articles were fine and not that all the bacterial articles were so utterly boring that nobody wanted to check them). Just pulling your leg. Keep up the good work. --Squidonius (talk) 08:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Coffee Chooo
Please undo your speedy deltion of Coffee Chooo as it is a coffeehouse in Australia that conducts charity and fundraising events for the Westmead Childrens Hospital in Sydney and has invented seveal hot beverages that will be listed on this page and is of importance, If this page was deleted do to it being a corporation then i beleive that the following pages must be deleted aswell: Gloria Jeans Coffees, Mc Donalds, Hudsons Coffee and everyother corporation that is listed on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joey1106 (talk • contribs) 05:22, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: New page patrol
OK. -- The Σ talkcontribs 01:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Mystreets
Hello The Elves Of Dunsimore. I am just letting you know that I deleted Mystreets, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * ok, thanks. -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 02:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Attack pages
When an unsourced page makes claims that its subject is a wanted criminal for raping men, that is a blatant attack page and needs to be blanked immediately and replaced with. This prevents Google's searchbot from indexing the content. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Xavier Weisenreder III
Hello! It's probably not a good idea to add citations to articles that are just mirrors of Wikipedia content, as you did here. The article is a hoax and the references were mirrors of Utilitarianism, where the hoax had been repeated. No harm done - just wanted you to be aware of it. Regards, --causa sui (talk) 06:25, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

userbox
hey how do I make a userbox that I can also use to nominate it for others to use? I've been trying, but i keep getting it wrong hence the CSOD. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 07:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Masanobu Sato
Hello The Elves Of Dunsimore. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Masanobu Sato, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Sourced, not negative in tone. Thank you. -- Lear's Fool 07:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note that I have nominated the article for deletion at Articles for deletion/Masanobu Sato. -- Lear's Fool 05:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Triangle
Why are you deleting my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rui78901 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

AutoPatrolled?
I am not sure exactly what this means. Have I done someting bad?Aleutian06 (talk) 22:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I found the definition. I guess that's a good thing, except I really appreciated the help I got from some of the new article patrollers. Thanks!Aleutian06 (talk) 22:10, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Drug2Gene
Hi. Could you be so kind to explain the reasons for deletion of Drug2Gene wiki page. I think this is a good free biological database which offers interesting information for the scientific community. There are references for the main source used in Drug2Gene. So please remove the fast deletion message from the Drug2Gene database.
 * for something to have a wikipedia article it really needs to be notable as defined here which is established by providing reliable sources which are defined here. hope that helps. -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

strxfrm
Hi.couuld you be so kind explain the reasons for deletion of strxfrm wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shraddha76 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Screencast for new NPP tool design?
Hello. This is Ian Baker. I'm a developer over at the Wikimedia Foundation.

tl;dr: We’re designing a much-improved UI for NPP tools, and we’re seeking guidance—and hopefully, screencasts of your NPP workflow—from expert New Page Patrollers like yourself. We’re asking for this so we can see (literally) what actions you take during patrolling which could be better supported through software.

I'm contacting you because, according to our statistics, you're a particularly active New Page Patroller on the English Wikipedia. Here at the WMF, we're working on a design for a much-improved NPP user interface. We hope that it will (as part of a larger strategy) address many outstanding issues in the article creation process, while also providing a more modern, streamlined and efficient UX for patrollers.

To do this successfully, we are relying upon the guidance of our most experienced patrollers. I'm sending this message to the ten most prolific patrollers in 2011, and a few other people who've been participating actively in this discussion.

Specifically, I'm hoping you can take a few minutes to record a screencast of yourself doing NPP. We're looking for a 10-15 minute session, but more is okay if you feel it's needed. Ideally, you'd first walk us through your process, explaining as you go, and then switch to doing NPP at your usual pace.

Our preliminary examination of this feature has shown that many experienced patrollers have evolved their own specially-tailored interface and workflow, often using external tools and plugins. Making an interface that works well will require understanding those tools and the motivation for using them. However, even if you haven't done that, observing your NPP technique will still be valuable, giving us insights into what factors inform your judgement, how you use the existing interface, and how long NPP generally takes an expert patroller such as yourself.

If you'd like to help, great! I've posted a set of instructions over at the relevant  thread on the Article Creation Workflow talk page, which should get you everything you need to know. If something's missing or you have a question, post it there. That's also the place to go if you want to learn more about the reasoning behind this request.

I understand that people have differing expectations of privacy with regard to their own computer and voice. Therefore, you can either post this screencast publicly (place a link in the talk page above) or if you'd prefer, send it to me privately at ian@wikimedia.org.

Of course, any other input on this feature that you’d like to provide is also welcome. Don't hesitate to get involved in the discussion on the above-linked talk page, or contact me personally. I'd love to hear from you.

Thanks! raindrift (talk) 00:21, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

RE: Stubs (a curious user asking questions)
I see your point-sort of, I guess. (Though I've created this account a while back, I haven't been editing a lot on Wikipedia.) I noticed a lot of articles, when first created, start off in a formation like the one I created and they didn't get deleted. Examples I noticed were: Nitrome, Storm Hawks, Team Galaxy. If those pages can stay, how come Neutronized cannot?  Random - Story  Keeper   06:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

All right
I see. Since Neutronized is a relatively new website, there is not much to say about it, so it would have to wait a little longer until the page can be created again. So reviews (like ones on JayisGames) and website articles on some of their games would not count?  Random - Story  Keeper   07:11, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hi. I see you  passed Institute of Sensory Organs as patrolled. Perhaps you did not  notice that  the article is completely  unreferenced. Please be sure to place a  tag on  the top  of such  articles. You should also  consider doing  a quick  research for reliable sources in  your favourite search  engine -  you  may  find that  the article needs a CSD or a PROD  tag. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:41, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrolling
Hi. I see you  passed Galerie Patrick Seguin as patrolled. Perhaps you did not  notice that  the article only  has primary  sources and does not  demonstrate importance among  the hundreds (maybe thousands) of galleries in  Paris. Please return to the article and see how it has now been tagged. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Vic Flowers
I forgot to thank you for removing the PROD template on Vic Flowers, so thank you, but unfortunatly it appears that someone's PROD-ded it again. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 07:31, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)