User talk:The Emperor's New Spy/Archive 16

Saxony
Hello. I can translate the articles on Saxony you asked for, but not right now. I'm going on holiday for the next two weeks. I'll translate them after I return. HansM (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I have translated them: Saxe-Altenburg, Saxe-Coburg-Eisenach and Saxe-Zeitz. HansM (talk) 11:53, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Delations
I'd like to ask you to help me to save the entries Peter of Aragon (heir of Sicily) & Martin of Aragon (heir of Sicily). I DO NOT UNDERSTAND why they should be delated because there exist few entries like this which are about crown princes that lived shortly, e.g. Miguel da Paz, Prince of Portugal, John, Prince of Girona, Charles Orlando, Dauphin of France, and I intend to improve them. And my main argument is that there are more poorer entries than this and they live happily. What is the pity with the two entries? Thanks for your attention and help. Best regards.Borgatya (talk) 13:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You did the right thing by removing the deletion request and explaining about it. There are two forms of deletions: speedy deletion and deletion by proposing it. The two were speedy deletions which would have deleted the pages if you didn't remove them by August 28. They probably won't be deleted now unless Srnec or another user still wants to delete them and decide to propose them for deletion. In the meantime it would be a good idea to improve them. Peter's article is fine and would get a lot of support for staying but Martin's probably would not.--Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy (talk) 05:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. Soon am gonna improve Martin, too. I DO NOT give the chance for delating it (or them) 'cause do not understand WHY.Borgatya (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Mary, Crown Princess of Denmark. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 13:15, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Miguel, Crown Prince of Portugal
Please, do read Talk:Miguel, Crown Prince of Portugal! Thanks.Borgatya (talk) 15:20, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

List of Thuringian consorts → workpage/userspace draft
I came across User:Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy/Sandbox/List of Thuringian consorts, and I'm impressed by the amount of work you've put into it. You should consider moving out to the main namespace. (I can see that it has many red links and lacks specific citations, but I don't think that's a entirely bad. If you list the source(s), perhaps other editors could follow up on that for you.)  Until is an "official article" please remember to place workpage or userspace draft the page, as well as comment out the categories so your draft doesn't appear alongside actual articles. Sincerely, Senator2029  ║  talk  07:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Hey you!
Are you going to keep deleting me edits all the time? I demand explanations from you. In case of Georgia, why did you delete my edits? I've put the anthem of Georgia and you edited it. I've put the map of Georgia, but you still put the map of Georgia with separatist regions highlighted. There are all the sources of Russian occupation of Georgian territories linked with every source and still you kept deleting my edits. As for case of Georgian consorts, all of them were of Bagrationi dynasty and that's WHY Bagrationi coat of arms are put and embeded but you keep deleting my edits. Cannot you just stop already? --GeorgianJorjadze (talk) 12:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I reverted your edits on Georgia because I seriously doubt your edits; I'm not going to argue with you about that article because I don't know enough about the subject, but you do understand that I am not the only user that has been having problems with your edits. And finally for the Georgian consorts, check the talk page.--Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy (talk) 17:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

About Beatrice of Portugal and her supposed son
Good day, Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy, I'm a portuguese Wikipedian and my english is bad. On Wp-po we have take profit of one of the frequents attacks of the "Beatrists" to finish with this novel of "her son Miguel", making an article desmytifying all the story since its beginning on 1618. I have translanted the article (missing the notes, but that I can do) and that translation is on the discussion page of the article Miguel, Crown Prince of Portugal, here, but the english it's horrible. Can't you, please, correct it? So I can put the text on the article?

note 1: the "Beatrists" are not trolls, they really believe on what they are saying. Since 2010, I found discussions on Internet genealogical sites attesting this. The problem it's they are not historians, but only "believers", but I think they begun to understand, at least some of them, that perhaps they are not right.

note 2: The deadh of Beatrice surely occurred after 1412. Now, maybe Serrano is right and she died about 1420, but that I can't tell you by sure because I haven't yet study what he wrote about and the documents that he gives on his book. Serrano wrote many mistakes (for example, about the sources on Miguel and on a second supposed son of Beatrice) and, so, without reading him, I can't tell you, but I'm inclined to say that, in this particulat point, the possible date of Beatrice's death, Serrano can be right. I'm going to study the question and, till February 2012, this will be resolved.

note 3: the historiographical current that defends Beatrice was titular Queen of Portugal between 22 Oct. and middle Dec 1383 it's a minoritary current. Their point of view is based on "interpretation", there wasn't any enthronization act neither any deposing act of her. In fact, this current is more pseudo-history than history. Some days ago, I send a note by e-mail to the Portuguese Association of Professors of History (about 2.500 members) saying exactly this, and some more things about. The association answered that they had sent my note to all their associates. Till the moment, neither a single one of the professors wrote me saying he disagreed. More, there wasn't also any formal act recognizing her mother, Leonor Teles, as Regent. What really there was, was many requirements of the towns and villages to Leonor Teles, reconizing her as their master, their Lady, and asking her to confirm their privileges. Her problem was that Juan I of Castile never accepted her as Regent, because he wanted to be King of Portugal by the right of his wife, what was forbbiden by the Treaty of Salvaterra «without the earing of the land».

Salutations, or, as we say on Portugal, um abraço, Jorge alo (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry I can't help. I don't understand Portuguese. You might want to try Wiki language desk.--Queen Elizabeth II&#39;s Little Spy (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I corrected a little Beatrice of Portugal article and, I think, all the references to the date of her dead. I think we can trust, on this, on what Serranio says. But, if necessary, in the futur we shall correct it. I followed your advice, but, till this moment, no one answered me on the «Reference desk/Language». Maybe it's not the right place, no? But I'm not worry with this, someone, in the end, will appear (the only thing I want is someone to make the english grammatical revision). Thank you for your advice and my salutations. Jorge alo (talk) 18:43, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Pedro I's children
Hi! Because they were either born after Brazilian independence or raised as Brazilian princesses. There is a very interestin book about it published in the early 19th century. Maria II was regarded as Pedro II's heir until 1834, when she was excluded from the line of succession. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)