User talk:The Excavator of Knowledge

Speedy deletion nomination of John Baker (singer)


A tag has been placed on John Baker (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Autobiography
Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at John Baker (singer). Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Baker (singer)


The article John Baker (singer) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I'm declining speedy deletion, but I'm still not 100% sure this singer passes WP:BAND; editors have a week to object.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Get the Knack has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Get the Knack was changed by The Excavator of Knowledge (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2014-07-17T17:33:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Error reported. --The Excavator of Knowledge (talk) 18:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Piriczki (talk) 20:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Reference Above Notice - Just in the for what it's worth category, I did not find your edits to be disruptive. You simply disagreed with Piriczki and made an edit based on that. While some of the categories you reverted to do not necessarily apply to Boston, it does not appear to have been a disruptive edit. Thanks Whitelitr (talk) 10:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)