User talk:The Founders Intent/Archive 1

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 034. Delivered: 10:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 035. Delivered: 15:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 036. Delivered: 11:22, 15 February 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Howdy
Howdy,

I would just like to thank you for all that you have done for the Wikiproject Military History. Thanks and Have a Great Day! Lord R. Oliver I His Lordship's Court 18:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

But you have done edits which have helped substantially, and I just want you to know that you are appreciated. Have a Great Day! Lord R. Oliver I His Lordship's Court 23:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Well I'm just afraid that we will lose Wikipedians if no one knows that what they are doing is being appreciated. Lord R. Oliver I His Lordship's Court 23:30, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Phil Gingrey
Did you go to youtube and listen to it? 74.37.238.14 (talk) 03:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 037. Delivered: 10:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Sports rules
I don't really have a strong position on the issue, however I am wondering if you could give me an example of a sports regulation which isn't really just a rule. After all there is the sports law category. I would consider any activity within some league to be merely a "rule", not a "regulation" in the way congress subpoenas players, etc. You seem to be reverting it awful quick, so you obviously have a strong view on it. It makes more sense to me the other way. Be well, Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 22:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * These things are usually discussed prior to taking action, which you did not do. The category was well estabished and extremely populated.  You must have felt strongly to go to so much trouble with CfD.  -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 23:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I certainly do not get permission for every little thing I do around here. The move appeared very non controversial. There are clearly reasonable cases where I might go through a proposal, and a cfd process, etc., and there are many cases where I would not bother. The presence of sports law sinched it for me. It is consistent with "game rules," etc.


 * I certainly do not feel so strongly about it to go through cfd. If people want it to stay where it is that's fine. Wikipedia works by consensus, and I do my part be being agreeable. In fact, if you would have convinced me of it I would have moved it back myself. However, you still have given me no particular reason for "rules and regulations" (although I suppose it couldn't be that you merely like the name on a whim --because you would never do that).


 * So I guess my question is, did you consider my proposal that it could be time to split out those regulations to their own category? That might actually be more helpful for people's navigation. Be well, Pontiff Greg Bard (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
tedder (talk) 16:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Hazardous Goods Vehicle
A tag has been placed on Hazardous Goods Vehicle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you're pissed, but deletion is not a reflection on you and you should not take it personally. Start your article here where you can edit it unmolested until it's ready to be moved into the body of the encyclopedia. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry you feel that way, there wasn't much there, which I could move to your user space were you to ask. You should review our policies whilst you calm down and remember that one of them is to maintain civility and not make personal attacks. If you cannot abide by these now, it's probably best if you desist from editing until you are able to. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

A holdon tag is no guarantee that a deletion won't take place. The holdon tag tells you to put the reasons for not deleting on the talk page. Did you? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:16, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

The talk page has never existed. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Do you want it restored to your user space? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

That's certainly your right, but just technically, nothing could be deleted before you saved it if it never existed, ever. No admin or anyone else can delete a page that has never been edited. Cheers, Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 038. Delivered: 11:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Heli-logging
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Heli-logging, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://forestry.com/blog/helicopter-logging-heli-logging. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleting pages
Why is there no room for discussion? Even when it's started on a talk page, you just poof delete everything. NO discussion allowed. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 17:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I assume you're referring to Heli-logging. That was deleted because it was copied without permission from another website. Deletions like this are authorized by Criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item #12. Stifle (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Then you better get busy because there are tons of things copied from the Internet. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 23:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I delete any that I can find. If you find one, please place at the top and an administrator will review it. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 039. Delivered: 11:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Chris Crowe
Hi, you tagged this article as unreferenced, even though it is...GiantSnowman 18:12, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * At the end of the article, listed under 'External links.' GiantSnowman 19:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No, but the tag states that "This article does not cite any references or sources"; and I have proved that it does. GiantSnowman 11:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I do yes. Of the two external links, one details his club career and the other his international one. I will, however, leave the refimprove tag you have added as, of course, inline citations are always prefrable. GiantSnowman 11:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't be an arse, remain civil. GiantSnowman 13:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I haven't acted like I own the article AT ALL - I simply removed a tag which, seeing as you have replaced it with a more accurate one, was obviously incorrect. GiantSnowman 13:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not interested in fencing with you. You obviously feel strongly about your editing power, as you did not replace the original tag with the one there now.  If you had been concerned about the page, and not your way, you might have.  -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 13:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't want to fence with you either; I simply mentioned my removal of the tag as a courtesy. True, I perhaps should have replaced it with a more appropiate one, but there's no need to create such a big fuss over a relatively minor issue. GiantSnowman 14:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct, and correcting the tag rather than a complete deletion would likely have evoked the desired response. Good luck.  -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 15:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 040. Delivered: 16:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 041. Delivered: 10:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 042. Delivered: 09:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 043. Delivered: 08:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, June 6, 2009
The 7th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, June 6th, starting at 5 p.m. The event will be at Bertucci's, near George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom metro station. It will follow the Apps for Democracy open source event at GWU. For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Meetup/DC 7. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.) Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot   at 20:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC) to report errors, please leave a note here.

Heli-logging
Hi There,

A couple months back you were doing some work with Heli-logging before it was deleted for copyright violations. It was created again today, but not in a terribly good form (i.e. I was about to speedy delete it again). Anyhow, I saw your old version, and since the article is a worthwhile topic, I just pulled an altered version of your old opening paragraph, and tagged the article as a stub. If you're interested, please feel free to wade back in and take a stab at expanding the article (just don't copy ad paste anything from another website). Hiberniantears (talk) 18:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 044. Delivered: 13:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 045. Delivered: 10:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 046. Delivered: 09:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 047. Delivered: 09:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Happy birthday!

 * Thanks a bunch!!! -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 18:03, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 048. Delivered: 09:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 049. Delivered: 09:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  05:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 050. Delivered: 10:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 051. Delivered: 16:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

American is not a language.
Your statement sounds rather Anglophobic. --Frank Fontaine (talk) 20:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I asked you a specific question didn’t I? Please remain civil or I will report you. --Frank Fontaine (talk) 17:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I asked you about the meaning behind your user box. I couldn’t have been clearer. It was more or less just a passing comment. --Frank Fontaine (talk) 17:41, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I thought that was Canadians, eh? --Frank Fontaine (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I some times have trouble understanding them to be honest. And do you like the portrait of James Madison? His eyes are great. --Frank Fontaine (talk) 18:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

D.C. Meetup, Saturday, September 26
The 8th DC Meetup dinner will be held this Saturday, September 26, starting at 6 p.m. The event will be at Burma Restaurant (740 6th St, NW near the Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station). For details or to RSVP if you haven't already, see Meetup/DC 8. (You have received this announcement because your user page indicates that you live in Maryland, Virginia, or DC.) --EdwardsBot (talk) 07:08, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 052. Delivered: 10:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:ODU Ainslie Football Complex.jpg
File:ODU Ainslie Football Complex.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:ODU Ainslie Football Complex.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Foreman Field Sep 09 against VUU.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Foreman Field Sep 09 against VUU.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 053. Delivered: 13:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Rush Limbaugh
Please add this link http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704322004574477021697942920.html

It's the Rush Limbaugh response posted at Wall Street Journal. It's a reputable source and very germane to the discussion. It should be linked to the article and talk page.

My read of the talk page tells me you might be an admin and can link this in.

216.153.214.89 (talk) 04:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 054. Delivered: 10:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

If you are not too busy...
Hello! I see you are a member of the guild of copy editors, and thought to seek your assistance seeing that we had some productive discourse in the past. I am working on a featured article which you might find interesting, based on your editing habits. Thomas R. Marshall is very close to passing an FA review, I feel. If you should have any spare time and could give a copy edit, it would be most appreciated! I have become very familiar with the text, and could use a second set of eyes from someone familiar with US politics. If you are busy then its no big deal. Thanks! &mdash;Charles Edward (Talk 03:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! It would be really appreciated. &mdash;Charles Edward (Talk 14:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Abuse response report rejected
I've rejected your recent abuse response report because there have been no blocks on the IP number. You may see the archived report at Abuse response/69.74.54.2. Netalarm talk  21:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * ... Very funny. Netalarm talk  03:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * ;) -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 11:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I'm trying to say your abuse report was rejected? Netalarm talk  00:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * And I'm trying to say I reject your abuse of my report.  -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 01:45, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Response to G-loading
Hello, could you leave a message on my talk page listing all the different uses of this term? I will then try my best to convert the page to a disambig as per your request at Redirects for Discussion. Thanks in advance! --Taelus (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 055. Delivered: 08:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 056. Delivered: 12:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Scouting elections
You are receiving this notice as an active member of WikiProject Scouting. To change your status as a member, please edit WikiProject Scouting/Members.

Rlevse is retiring as our lead coordinator; see Stepping down as ScoutingWikiProject Lead Coordinator. Election for a new coordinator will be held after the new year. If you are interested in nominating yourself or another editor, please add the name to Project coordinator election.

Yours in Scouting

---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 17:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 057. Delivered: 19:06, 6 December 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Thanks!
is quite a surprise, and appreciated! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 15:06, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

TFI, thanks for the two barnstars! Take care. -Fnlayson (talk) 17:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 058. Delivered: 13:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:57, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 059. Delivered: 11:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 060. Delivered: 16:24, 18 January 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Nobel Prize help
Hey! I found you on the "Guild of Copy Editors" page. I am currently working on the Nobel Prize article and I am going to nominate it for a GA soon, hopefully before the end of this week. However, it could need some more grammar/prose checks to make it better. I was wondering if you could give me a hand? Especially the parts after "History" needs some looking into. I would be very grateful for any help :)

Cheers --Esuzu 18:14, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 061. Delivered: 14:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 062. Delivered: 11:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 063. Delivered: 15:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 064. Delivered: 18:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 065. Delivered: 12:50, 28 March 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 066. Delivered: 13:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 067. Delivered: 10:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message
It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving. In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire. If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list. If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 068. Delivered: 07:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Motto of the Day
Hi there, The Founders Intent! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 12:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 069. Delivered: 11:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 070. Delivered: 15:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar
Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 15:23, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 071. Delivered: 16:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 072. Delivered: 17:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 073. Delivered: 12:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Happy Birthday (2010)
Armbrust Talk  Contribs  23:28, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 074. Delivered: 15:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

David Barton page
To whom it may concern: My edits were an attempt to let someone know that the page is a biased hit-piece. Reading this page, you'd think it was written by an ex-girlfriend of Barton's who has vowed to exact some kind of revenge against him. It is ok and necessary to show negative comments about a person or his qualifications, etc., but this page is so far slated against him that my screen almost slid off of my desk. The page quotes people who obviously have great animosity towards Barton and his beliefs as if they are objective obervers. For example, quoting the opinion of an anti-religious freedom group like Americans United for the Seperation of Church and State should be accompanied with an explanation that their opinion of Barton is extremely biased. Believe me, people reading this page deserve to hear more from Barton than from Spector. His opinion of Barton belongs on this page about as much as Paris Hilton's opinion of George Washington belongs on his. Sincerely 146.130.125.114 (talk) 15:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

barton page
Great. Sorry for my haste in trying to correct this problem. I was a little upset that it took longer to find negative information on the pages of Castro, Chavez, and Mao than on the page of David Barton. You can understand my shock at this blatant character assasination taking place. I hope we can find a way to get this page to tell a fair, well documented, balanced, two-sided, truthful story of who this man is. Sincerely, 146.130.125.114 (talk) 15:23, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 075. Delivered: 15:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Question for administrator

 * Why don't any toolbars show up when I edit? -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 13:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The most likely reason is that you have disabled it in preferences->editing, or that you use a browser without JavaScript capability (possibly because you have disabled it). Can you check those two? This is not really an admin question, though. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Jefferson
Hi! I just noticed your interpretation of the US constitution as not being a living document, but embodying eternal truths. That's arguable. But what I am surprised about is that you quote Jefferson in support. Jefferson very much held the opposite position - he considered it somewhat flawed ("yet every human essay must have defects"), in no way binding for future generations ("The present generation has the same right of self-government which the past one has exercised for itself.", "Can one generation bind another and all others in succession forever? I think not."), and called for frequent rewriting to adapt to new situations ("Time and changes in the condition and constitution of society may require occasional and corresponding modifications", "We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors"). All quotes conveniently assembled at. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes Stephan, but what you and every other lefty failed to grasp is that you must amend the Constitution to change the interpretation. Jefferson never said anything to the contrary.  Sure each generation can change things, and there is a process for doing so. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 13:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, that may be your opinion (and I don't intend to dispute it), but its not Jefferson's. Jefferson found the amendment process cumbersome, and repeatedly stated preference for a complete remodelling of the social contract "every 19 or 20 years" ("Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. It may be said, that the succeeding generation exercising, in fact, the power of repeal, this leaves them as free as if the constitution or law had been expressly limited to nineteen years only. In the first place, this objection admits the right, in proposing an equivalent. But the power of repeal is not an equivalent.[...]"), sometimes even polemically calling for a regular re-revolution ("God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. [...] The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."). --Stephan Schulz (talk) 13:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Well that's great, and Jefferson knew what the process to change that was, just as it is today. You don't get to cheat the system because it's "cumbersome", as it should be.  Read the Declaration of Independence and other quotes by Jefferson, and you'll find he wasn't for just throwing aside laws as you might think by just any means.  Frustration is not a viable excuse to legislate from the bench. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 14:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * What do you call the Declaration of Independence if not "cheating of the system" that was in force back then? I agree, of course, that Jefferson had a dim view of legislating from the bench (he just loved John Marshall ;-), but that's a different question. And, of course, Jefferson lost that debate... --Stephan Schulz (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * You can't just look at the single document out of context and say it was cheating. They had used every legal means available, and the King was stationing troops in Boston, something he did not do at home.  The English people were also represented in Parliament, something the colonists were not.  So there is more to the story that you are ignoring, and must take into consideration.  These men were also duly elected by the people in their states. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 14:34, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * So you only get to cheat if you would otherwise lose? But I think this digresses to far from the point, namely that choosing Jefferson as a proponent of a static, inflexible constitutional order is misusing him. But I suspect we are unlikely to agree if we argue till 1086. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Jefferson never believed the Constitution was flexible, except that it could be amended. Read his quote on my page on question of construction.  No he wasn't flexible, at all, otherwise the clauses could mean nothing or anything. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 16:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thunderclap plan
What I wrote was "The request was made by the Soviets, for the bombing of choke points, including Berlin and Leipzig, the other cities were added during the discussions. so not accurate to say there was no reqst"

My reversal has nothing to do with me being an administrator (when it come to content administrators have no more of a preferential position than any other editor). What we do have some discretion over is the behaviour of editors who have been naughty. For example I reverted a cut and past move recently, and in doing so I discovered that the editor concerned had been engaging in such practice with dozens of pages, there for I took it further.

In this case you made a bold edit and I have reverted it. My source for doing this is listed in the article. I am happy to discuss it further on the talk page of the article. I would be interested in why you think that no request was made, are you sure that you do not mean that no written request was made for Dresden? There is disagreement among historians over whether Dresden was discussed, but I have not read an account that says that the Soviets did not discuss bombing lines and the help the Western Allies could give the Soviets interdicting troop movements to the Eastern Front. -- PBS (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)


 * It helps with navigation. I have been reading the source you have supplied. It is not a reliable source because Conroy writing in 1989 leans heavily on David Irving's now discredited book (See Richard J. Evans. David Irving, Hitler and Holocaust Denial: Electronic Edition, 6. General Conclusion Paragraphs 6.8, 6.20, 6.21). Specifically On page 32 there is a comment "No documents have been found to link the Soviets to a formal request for bombing of the Eastern Front.12" (Footnote 12 is to Irving p. 228). -- PBS (talk) 23:16, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but I don't see your point. I'm not a professional historian, but I do try to find the best sources I can.  I don't see the link with the Halocaust, and I don't know which discredited book you mean. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 13:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The point is that Irving's research can not be trusted. Many people before Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt did not realise that he is not a trustworthy person, so it is not unusual to find him cited in older articles. But we now know that we can not trust his word, so if someone like Conroy makes a statement based on "research" done by Irving, it can not be trusted to be accurate. In this case on page 32 Conway wrote "No documents have been found to link the Soviets to a formal request for bombing of the Eastern Front", but he cited Irving for this (but we know Irving is untrustworthy) and more recent research done by a number of historians has turned up documentary evidence of the request. However that documentary evidence does not include Dresden. Taylor relies on (and explains) that one of the British interpreters says he heard the Soviets agree to include Dresden, but some other historians have pointed out that the translator made this claim after the cold war had stated, and he may have said it for propaganda reasons. "You pays your money and makes a choice" on the issue of Dresden, but there is no dispute that the bombing of choke points along with a bomb line was discussed. (A bomb line was the point east beyond which the Western Allis would not bomb for fear of hitting Soviet formations. The Western Allies had a similar line drawn up by the army groups and air forces in the west for the same reason). -- PBS (talk) 02:00, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

On another issue see Talk:Library of Alexandria and this edit to Library of Alexandria. -- PBS (talk) 02:00, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * So you disagreed with Mr Deipnosophista's explanation? -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 13:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 076. Delivered: 15:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 077. Delivered: 13:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Reply, on "WikiProject merge"
— SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 00:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Pilate redirect
I wasn't the closing admin (that was ξ xplicit ) so I this is not how I normally administer. I gave my opinion there as an editor.

The nominator, Ja <font color="#000099">Ga <font color="#000000" size="-1">talk, has the onus to notify the editors involved in the RFD per this excerpt from WP:RFD It is generally considered civil to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the redirect that you are nominating the redirect. (emphasis mine).

I hope that answers your question.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 23:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Category
Hi. You added back the category to Am. Rev. War on the basis that American Revolution was also in this cat. Are you aware that this category is a few days old and American Revolution was added today? . The same objections I raised on the talk page apply to that too. It is circular to argue that it's OK to include American Revolutionary War in this category because American Revolution is in it. (Why is it OK for American Revolution to be in this category?) The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick t 12:21, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 078. Delivered: 21:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

US, a product of the British Empire?
This featured article British Empire refers to the US as a "product" of the British Empire (British_empire). I am not too comfortable with the word as the US is generally seen to be a product of a bloody war against the British Empire. Just wanted to check with you on your views about the small but important statement in a widely viewed article. Zuggernaut (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Warning vandals
Please warn vandals after you revert vandalism, preferably using templates such as those included with Twinkle. For example, you reverted this vandalism but did not leave the IP a warning template. If you had done so, the following warning templates would have led to a block for this IP and prevented the 15 following vandalism edits to smog. Thanks <font color=#81BEF7>Je <font color=#58ACFA>b <font color=#0080FF>us <font color=#0174DF>9 <font color=#045FB4>8 <font color=#084B8A>9  ✰ 15:59, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 079. Delivered: 07:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Assessment fro Conservatism in the US article
I assessed the article as C per your request for assessment. There are still quite a few problems with it that I can see just by skimming through it. Here are some suggestions for further improvement: I hope this helps. --Kumioko (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Try to add a few more images.
 * Could stand to use a few more links
 * Take the inline citations out of the lede and add them where they belong in the article.
 * There are way way too many references. Try pruning out some of the less useful or unused ones.
 * You might want to consider breaking out the list of Notables into its own list article.
 * It needs some prose work. Some of the wording is a little too complex (too many big words).
 * Several sections still lack inline citations.

Talk:Weston Price
I've removed your comment from Talk:Weston Price as it appears to make accusations of improper behavior, and use those accusations as rational for content changes. --Ronz (talk) 15:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Care to make an attempt to justify the comment, rather than harass me for hiding it? --Ronz (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for toning down your language.
 * Please note that you've twice now removed my comments to the talk page, apparently by accident. --Ronz (talk) 02:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you please stop making comments like this? I'm hoping you made it before your reading my previous comments here. --Ronz (talk) 03:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

WP:BLP concerns
I've removed both your recent addition to Stephen Barrett and your comment about him on Talk:Weston Price. The latter is a clear WP:BLP violation. The addition to the article wasn't as much a direct BLP problem as it was just an agreement not to include because of BLP concerns. --Ronz (talk) 22:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I found and noted the dates when the material was finally removed from the article. I added a link to Barrett v. Rosenthal to the article after looking everything over. --Ronz (talk) 23:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * --Ronz (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Consensus approach to editing
I didn't notice your interjection here. You bring up some good points. Care to discuss them here? --Ronz (talk) 16:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I hesitate to go further here, but I'll bite this once. I don't like to elevate arguments to a higher authority, but if it can't be sorted out at the lowest level I will. I don't go for arguing on noticeboards over things that shouldn't require lots of arguing. The article is about Weston Price, not about how to debunk his work. Weston Price was not a quack. Difference of opinion with his contemporaries on an issue does not make him a quack. We should be adding sourced information about his work to the article. Using a live person to criticize a dead person is unethical, IMHO. We can't criticize Barrett because of the rules and policies you drum us with. Price isn't here to defend himself, and Barrett is protected by WP policy. The fact that Barrett makes his living on quackbusting and isn't even a dental researcher makes it worse. In my view criticism should be allowed, but IN A CAUTIOUS WAY (rational and wells sourced). We can't prove that Price's intent was to deceive the public, in fact all evidence points the other way. We need to work this article as a group, and give each editor's opinion the weight it should deserve, and not make this effort about policy. I've already added more content on his research in traditional dentistry. The Price Foundation is another entity and was not started by Price. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 16:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with almost nothing you've written, so I'm going to focus on the one small exception:
 * "We should be adding sourced information about his work to the article." We agree upon that. We should be doing a great deal more, but maybe the rest can be put aside for the moment. It would be a very helpful turn of events if editors just focused on finding and evaluating sources. --Ronz (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Then I assume you'll continue to concentrate on policing editors and enforcing policy. Not helpful at all. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 17:27, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Your assumptions are neither helpful nor accurate. If you'd simply follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines, you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself so, and setting yourself up to be blocked or banned.
 * So you feel that enforcing policy isn't helpful? I know that those that intend to violate policy agree with you. They end up blocked or banned. Do you want the same to happen to you? --Ronz (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Helpful, but not paramount. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 18:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Who started what discussions?
Could you remind me which discussions I started, and why it's worth bringing up at FTN? I can't seem to figure out what you're referring to, or why it would matter. I didn't start the FTN or RSN discussion, nor any of the major discussions on the article talk page. --Ronz (talk) 03:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You are more concerned with controlling editors and applying policy than you are with adding content to articles. I've reviewed your contribution history, and don't want anything to do with you. Be gone. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 10:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You reviewed my editing history and purposely still misrepresent it? --Ronz (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Purposely? And you know this how? Sounds like you are bordering on harrassment here. I suggest you just go about your own business. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 16:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * My mistake. Even as a question, it would be better if I hadn't used a word that indicates possible intent. I've struck it out. --Ronz (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * So, are you capable of agreeing you made a mistake? How about correcting your mistake? --Ronz (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If you're not going to respond further, I'll simply remove the comment because it is inaccurate, it misrepresents the situation, it places blame on an editor, and it is disruptive to the situation. --Ronz (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Careful how you use the term "disruptive", you could be violating a rule. Arbitrarily removing comments by other editors without permission is also against the rules. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 18:57, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I stand by the term "disruptive" given all the evidence, none of which is in dispute. --Ronz (talk) 19:53, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Whatever floats your boat, my man. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 21:06, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I've removed it then, noting the discussion here and the problems it causes which you do not dispute. --Ronz (talk) 22:35, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Ronz, please discontinue from posting on my talk page. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 02:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

For the record I started the FT/N discussion. Cheers.Griswaldo (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ronz needs to mature a bit. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 00:15, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
I'm taking your edit here as an indication of a change for the better. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 15:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Looking for an explanation
Sorry that I assumed you were drunk. If you weren't, then perhaps you have another explanation? Using the situation you caused as a reason to attack me now is hardly helpful or indicative that you intend to follow Wikipedia's behavioral guidelines. --Ronz (talk) 15:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You broke a huge rule on personal attacks. I don't owe you any explanation as to my state of mind, as it is irrelevant to your behavior. I'm not ruling out the possibility of bringing this incident forward, though it is not my nature to. I have asked you to stay away from me, and refrain from posting on my talk page, yet you persist. You placed the insult on another user's talk page, which is worse than posting it here. Furthermore you have not followed the spirit of any guidelines that you preach, in my view. You have behaved identically to other users associated with the Weston Price/Barrett dispute, which is clearly noted on their user talk pages and the noticeboards. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 15:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry I was unclear. I'm asking for an explanation for your behavior. The behavior which I was unable to find a good faith explanation for.
 * I didn't attribute malice to your behavior, but I shouldn't have attributed anything else to it either. Again, I'm sorry. --Ronz (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Only because WP promotes exhaustive application of benefit of the doubt, the assumption of good faith and my wish to avoid conflict will I let this slide. But if you stalk me, insult me, harass me or disrupt my work on WP any further, I will pursue an enforcement request to the fullest extent possible. I am here to enjoy work in editing articles of interest on WP. I am not here to be harassed by quibbling over WP policy or self-appointed policing of WP. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 15:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Courtesy notice
I think we settled these problems, but I felt they were important to mention at BLPN given the problems from other editors. --Ronz (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Refactored my comment for you
I've struckout my comment that you objected to, and wrote a more neutral reply based upon the guidelines for the noticeboard itself. --Ronz (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Very kind, but I do see the change notices on my watch list. You don't have to include comments here. Thanks. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 15:11, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I wanted to get your response, and have it somewhere other than the noticeboard where we could discuss the situation further if necessary. I'm glad it's settled. --Ronz (talk) 15:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

'Have a Beer' award
Thanks a lot TFI! Keep up the good work you do. -fnlayson (talk) 20:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Huh?
I've removed from my talk page. Looks like an error of some sort. --Ronz (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It now looks purposeful . --Ronz (talk) 01:51, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Really? BTW, I thought I told you to stay off my talk page. I have no interest in talking to you. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE GOOD WORKS 02:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I realize you have taken some offense to some of the comments I've made on your talk page. I'll do my best to be concise, follow WP:TALK, only comment on important concerns (matters of policy or the like), and only use your talk page when other forums would be inappropriate. --Ronz (talk) 02:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
A new newsletter has been released; WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 080. Delivered: 09:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

BLPN
Following with my comment at BLPN : Here's an example: If you had only written, I'd have said it was a BLP violation - no source, no indication of what the problem it was or how it related to the discussion. It appears to purposely attack Barrett. But when you wrote it after, it looked particularly libelous. First you attack Barrett in the article about him, then your very next edit attacks him in a talk page. --Ronz (talk) 01:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Re. I don't believe I said it is "essential." I did say, "I'd emphasize the purpose of BLP, to ensure material is not defamatory or libelous, regardless of where it is within Wikipedia." --Ronz (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * TFI - in case you're not aware, there's a current discussion about Ronz behavior on BPLN over at ANI - ANI. FYI.  -- Ludwigs 2  01:40, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Link to contributions in signature
Just in case you had not noticed, the GOOD WORKS link in your signature currently links to Special:Contributions, not Special:Contributions/The Founders Intent (c.f. my signature). No worries if this is intentional. - 2/0 (cont.) 16:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Can the EU be said to have a 'geography'?
Would you like to look at this discussion:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:European_Union#EU_has_a_geography.3FAndrewing123 (talk) 11:24, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:41, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

Articles that don't lend themselves to referencing
Well, the proper authority is us, the Wikipedians. We just have to get through the layers of long-timers who have been doing the same thing for years and years, but I believe that a properly worked-out policy could actually get adopted (that is, get consensus for change). Suppose you and I work out some kind of new procedure for sourcing Lists and Years, propose it and see what happens? It might take quite a while, but I think there are lots of folks who think as you and I do. I can start by drafting some ideas that I have. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, why don't you draft a first cut and I'll take a look. You could set a sandbox on your page. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 15:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 02:05, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 00:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

review
You have recently deleted the a page about Stuart Miller. that page had nothing to do with advertising at all. it was a evoltuion of the very first baby seat for airlines, and the process that it took to make it a law for kids to be in one. please put it back up and place it in the correct area under the name of the aviation inventor Stuart Miller. thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stingerone (talk • contribs) 16:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Contribution Team
Hi there! This is a message sent to all members of the Contribution Team. We're letting you know that there has been a rather major update - you can read more about it at Wikipedia talk:Contribution Team. Kind regards, Panyd and Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Cookie
Thanks you for the warm wishes. I hope you have a good holiday season, too! - Ahunt (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)



GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

 * Welcome to the project and please let me know if you have any comments, questions or suggestions. --Kumioko (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

New Years Message for WikiProject United States
With the first of what I hope will be monthly newsletters I again want to welcome you to the project and hope that as we all work together through the year we can expand the project, create missing articles and generally improve the pedia thought mutual cooperation and support. Now that we have a project and a solid pool of willing members I wanted to strike while the iron is hot and solicite help in doing a few things that I believe is a good next step in solidifiing the project. I have outlined a few suggestions where you can help with on the projects talk page. This includes but is not limited too updating Portal:United States, assessing the remaining US related articles that haven't been assessed, eliminating the Unrefernced BLP's and others. If you have other suggestions or are interested in doing other things feel free. I just wanted to offer a few suggestions were additional help is needed. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or suggestions or you can always post something on the projects talk page. If you do not want to recieve a monthly message please put an * before your name on the members page.--Kumioko (talk) 05:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Doug McClure
Thanks for the note. I have nothing to do with the photograph. Not sure how or why it was attributed to me. I've removed my name from it. Cbl62 (talk) 04:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy 10th Anniversary of Wikipedia!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#aa9944; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> Happy 10th anniversary of Wikipedia! Hey Bzuk  (contribs) has bought you a whisky! Sharing a whisky is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a whisky, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Enjoy!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Bzuk (talk) 15:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 21:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

Thomas Jefferson
Hello, The Founders Intent! I recently made this change to the article to improve the POV, but was reverted. I would like to know if you would be interested in giving your opinion. This is the link. All help is needed. Thank your very much and kind regards, Tobby72 (talk) 13:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks,
Thanks for your participation in this years fundraiser/contribution team effort. It's the first time we've ever tried doing anything like this combined, and it worked really well. We look forward to your help next year! Regards, &rArr; <font face="Euclid Fraktur"> Dan  Rosenthal   (WMF)  08:55, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

New WikiProject United States Newsletter: February 2011 edition
Starting with the February 2011 issue WikiProject United States has established a newsletter to inform anyone interested in United States related topics of the latest changes. This newsletter will not only discuss issues relating to WikiProject United States but also: You may read or assist in writing the newsletter, subscribe, unsubscribe or change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you by following this link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page or the Newsletters talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Portal:United States
 * 2) the United States Wikipedians Noticeboard
 * 3) the United States Wikipedians collaboration of the Month - The collaboration article for February is Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
 * 4) and changes to Wikipolicy, events and other things that may be of interest to you.

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

My apology
I realize you have taken some offense to some of the comments I've made on your talk page. I'll do my best to be concise, follow WP:TALK, only comment on important concerns (matters of policy or the like), and only use your talk page when other forums would be inappropriate. (originally added here 02:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)) --Ronz (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

If you really want to help...
I noticed that you commented on one of the involved parties in this mess and thought if you really want to help how about bringing your thoughts on this matter to Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents?


 * I don't understand your "you guys blew me off" comment. As someone who has ADHD I tend to hpyerfocus on the problem at hand with is correct a load of what I see is really bad POV and MEDRS and given the near literally flood of nonsense Ronz was putting out at the time it was difficult to keep track of what was going on.--BruceGrubb (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Vote needed
Votes are needed on the Thomas Jefferson talk page, (1st section) Gwillhickers (talk) 02:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Page Progress in Mid-March
Your attention and input is needed again on the Thomas Jefferson talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Your change to my MCQ post
I have reverted your edit here. After your change my post made no sense: the different spelling was the point of it. Please excersise restraint in modifying other people's posts to talk pages and discussion forums. —teb728 t c 22:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understood from the beginning why you did it. But it was neither necessary nor appropriate for you to do it. See the guideline on editing others’ comments. I realize your edit was well intentioned, but it changed the meaning of my post. BTW, please also see Civility. —teb728 t c 01:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 01:29, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Death panel
Hello. I'm commenting here because the conversation has moved away, in my opinion, from focusing on the article's content. No, there isn't a reason why I don't want attention. I think noticeboards are the places to get attention (such as WP:NPOVN). If you look back in the archive, you'll see comments from users Sean Hoyland, Critical, and Will Beback. They are experienced editors and they arrived to the talk page at times when there was a posting to a noticeboard. I don't think tags are effective recruitment tools. Do you want me to start a post at WP:NPOVN? At this point, though, it doesn't appear you have a POV problem with the article. Here are the number of people that have death panel on their watchlist. (But yes, I started the article and I think I am the chief content contributor, though quite a few have contributed and discussed things.) You can go to any article, click on the history tab, then click on "Number of watchers" to get there. Best. Jesanj (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Personal talk page are appropriate to discuss article content issues. Why are you doing it? -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 22:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * What are you asking? Jesanj (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Stop posting article discussion on my talk page, is that clear enough? -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 12:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, but in that case it appears you're missing a not when you say "Personal talk page are appropriate to discuss article content issues". (I also thought I posted general wiki-issue stuff, items unnecessary to make everyone read at death panel.) Best. Jesanj (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:51, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
.--Kumioko (talk) 02:51, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Lincoln Memorial section
We are currently attempting to bring the Abraham Lincoln article to FA status and are trying to establish consensus regarding images. Your consensus and opinion is needed on the Abraham Lincoln talk page. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:37, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gwillhickers
You are invited to join the discussion at Requests for comment/Gwillhickers. Coemgenus 15:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC) (Using )

June 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 23:39, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

RAH-66 Comanche
Is it better now? <b style="background:HotPink;color:white;">Sp33dyphil</b> "Ad astra" 13:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I noticed a lot of changes, not sure why you deleted the reference to the Duke. If you have done some search you would have found out what that means here. My usual approach isn't just to delete something immediately because I don't know what it is. I think it's good that the redundancies were removed. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 14:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Slavery
Your artical on slavery completely misses the fact the there were more white slaves in the sugar colonies and the virginia colony that black. The term indentured servants was modified in fact to mean the after 1660 whites could nver escape their slavery. Google "Irish slavery" or "white slaves in america" and see the results. In Barbados over 80 percent of the sugar slaves were white. The same is true of Montseratt. Get behind the whitwash of "indentured servants" and you will find that Irish slaves were worth 5 lbs. but african slaves were worth 50 lbs. ad were better treated as a result. Fred Carter carterfr@aol.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.99.95.236 (talk) 16:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't have an article on slavery. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 22:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Categorizing
It hasn't happened yet, but sure! I have no preference as to which. Katharineamy (talk) 21:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 17:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Class 04
Hi TFI, I'm not clear why you've left a notability tag at Class 04 as this is clearly a disambiguation page, not an article. --Bermicourt (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * It appears that these pages are setup only for two articles. Is that the best way to use a diambiguation page? -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 16:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, I understand where you're coming from. Ordinarily no, hatnotes would be better IMHO but a) there is a whole series of these "Class XX" railway loco dab pages;most have more than two links - e.g. Class 25 - and they are regularly added to, and b) thus there is a degree of conformity about the present series of dab pages. I have no issue with Class 04 being hatnoted at the two articles concerned, but is it worth it? --Bermicourt (talk) 14:03, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * You can revert if you like, no problem. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 17:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 02:34, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Aircraft of the War in Afghanistan (2001-present)
Category:Aircraft of the War in Afghanistan (2001-present), which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 22:32, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:52, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 02:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

MILHIST Military Aviation Questionaire
Hi The Founders Intent! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:
 * 1) What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
 * 2) Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
 * 3) What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
 * 4) Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil and filling it out.
 * 1) My strengths
 * 2) Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
 * 3) Sources which I have
 * 4) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil ©hat<sub style='position: relative; left: -1.5em;'>ontributions 22:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that Boeing CH-47 Chinook revert
I had a mouse lag misclick. Reverted myself back to your version. :( Syrthiss (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  PRAISE 13:41, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Inline hockey rules
Category:Inline hockey rules, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. <sup style="color:#E3A857;">Let's talk <sub style="color:#008000;">about my edits? 03:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 14:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:32, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution IRC office hours.
Hello there. As you expressed interest in hearing updates to my research in the dispute resolution survey that was done a few months ago, I just wanted to let you know that I am hosting an IRC office hours session this coming Saturday, 28th July at 19:00 UTC (approximately 12 hours from now). This will be located in the IRC channel - if you have not participated in an IRC discussion before you can connect to IRC here.

Regards, User:Szhang (WMF) (talk) 07:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:52, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

A gift for your front page...
I noticed that you write "Therefore, the US Constitution is NOT a living document in the context of being something that should be interpreted and molded to each era's defining issues.", and quote Jefferson on it. For your consideration, here is a different quote, to ponder, enjoy, and possibly add for balance:
 * On similar ground it may be proved that no society can make a perpetual constitution, or even a perpetual law. The earth belongs always to the living generation. They may manage it then, and what proceeds from it, as they please, during their usufruct. They are masters too of their own persons, and consequently may govern them as they please. But persons and property make the sum of the objects of government. The constitution and the laws of their predecessors extinguished then in their natural course with those who gave them being. This could preserve that being till it ceased to be itself, and no longer. Every constitution then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of 19 years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right. Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 6 Sept. 1789

Enjoy! --Stephan Schulz (talk) 11:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 10:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC)