User talk:The Founders Intent/Archives/2008/March

Amsoil
Who are the editors?

Why don't you people sign your posts? Scared we might find out who you are? I can tell that the anti-Amsoilers are writing most of this stuff. At least cite your allegations with sources.--THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 00:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

That's quite a chip on your shoulder - and an extraordinarily aggressive posture to take over a bland Wiki entry. You have removed factual references to the testing regimes of specific manufacturers and have generally slanted this article towards an advertorial for a commercial product.

Between this non-neutral editing and your full frontal assault on the character of those who are attempting to contribute I will strongly suggest that you have a non-neutral point of view. As a previous editor has pointed out this should read no differently than the entrys for Royal Purple, Castrol, Pennzoil or any of the other independent oil marketing companies out there.

3RR Three Revert Rule Warning:

Quoted from Wikipedia: Three-revert rule:

An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time.

Editors who violate the three-revert rule may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours, or longer in the case of a repeated or aggravated violation. Many administrators use escalating block lengths for users with prior violations, and tend to consider other factors, like edit warring on multiple pages or incivility, when assigning a block.

You have made over 10 Reverts in the last hour on the entry for Amsoil. This is fair notice of the wiki policy. 18:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

How many reverts have you made?-- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  TALK 20:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

A change, be it the addition of content or the correction of typo's is not a reversion. This is an example of you simply wiping out a number of contributions 'en masse':

"7 March 2008 The Founders Intent (5,065 bytes) (Reverted (NINE) edits ... to last version by The Founders Intent)"

Your inability to work from a neutral point of view and desire for complete editorial control is not in the best interest of this particular Wiki entry. 21:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I made entries and referenced them. You deleted them because you didn't agree; you call that mature?  You accused me of writing a press release, when all I was doing was trying to improve the poorly written section that was there before me.  You made other changes simultaneously so you could accuse me of wiping out "en masse", didn't you?  How childish.  If you wanted to work this out you would have kept that section separated, and had a discussion on the Talk page.  Get youself a real account and stop bother people who are trying to make improvements. -- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  TALK 16:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikiproject Earth
Hello i proposed Wikiproject Earth and you so rudely and immaturely put " Uninterested Wikipedians (add Your Name Here) so i ask to not do it again out of common decency. Because the is not needed and plainly just ruse if you dont like a proposal make a comment on it. Your approach was very immature. Thank you. IwilledituTalk :)Contributions 23:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC) I thought it was better than saying something negative.  Sorry you took it that way.-- T HE F OUNDERS I NTENT  TALK 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Herrenhauser Brewery
A tag has been placed on Herrenhauser Brewery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 13:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)