User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2010/May

Look before you delete
You deleted an entry from an encyclopedia which is accepted on many other WP articles, and listed the reason as "keep this article encyclopedic" Did you even view the source? Darkstar1st (talk) 01:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC) please use the WP:Template messages/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources instead of deleting sourced material from a WP:RS)Darkstar1st (talk) 02:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

On the Socialist Workers' Party (United States) page
The reason for my edit which you reverted was that it says so in the article itself. There are no sources for that information, so should it be deleted? The info seems accurate, but I'm no Wikipedia expert. 71.184.241.77 (talk) 21:19, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Arguing with Idiots
I have brought back up a discussion in the Arguing with Idiots Talk Page(I'd link you but I'm not sure how) and see that you were a contributor to the former discussion. I'm rounding up the people from the previous discussion. Any input would be appreciated. :)  Ink Falls   02:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Automatic archiving of mbox?
Hi!

I've been trying to make sense of. I've been looking over edits by MiszaBot to the page, and none of them (as far as I can see) have automatically archived the mbox. The box seems to have been added, no edits since then has automatically archived that box. And it would be very strange if MiszaBot did, since it only archives texts listed under section headings, not templates given before the table of contents, regardless of whether those templates are above or below the talkheader.

Perhaps you have information I don't? Don't hesitate to let me know! Gabbe (talk) 21:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

neoliberalism hegemony
regarding ur post on the neoliberalism talk page (that is ur most recent one) i wanted to know if you have sites/books or other sources that you could direct me to. Im asking this on ur talk page as i want to find the sources in order to further my understanding as u and other editors believe in this point of veiw and maybe it is me that is missing something. I felt that if i posted it on the neoliberalism talk page it would sound like an attack something like "prove your right etc" so i posted it here. PeaceDigmores (talk) 23:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Re
RE: Please keep in mind that several people are under this topic ban: .Biophys (talk) 02:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

re: AfD: Putinism
Hello. My vote would be to remove. Every material in that article is sourced, but the article stays biased due to selectivity of choice of the sources. Simply like that -- there's a hell of a lot of information produced by the United Russia party, available online. A sincere researcher would have to get through the whole of it, including a great number of analytical articles.

But I am under a topic ban, so I can not take part in the vote. Regards, ellol (talk) 08:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)