User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2013/February

Need an uninvolved editor for single-payer dispute
Hey TFD. There has been a long standing dispute in the Single-payer health care article over a polling section. As I see it, the consensus was long established for this version but two editors have been edit warring against it and have been inserting a conservative POV. It's been through virtually every mediation process known and to no avail. If you could take a look at it, it would be much appreciated. CartoonDiablo (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree that the polls in dispute are about single-payer. However you need to provide a secondary source that interprets them that way before including. Each and every poll should be included in that source.  That avoids personal interpretation of primary sources and establishes the weight required for inclusion.  Also, if the opinion expressed by the other two editors is correct, then you would not be able to find a secondary source, or if you did they could find one that disputed it.  TFD (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

When are you going to answer me?
When are you going to answer me at talk:socialism? A50000 (talk) 20:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)