User talk:The Gerg/archive 2

{| width=100% cellpadding=12pt
 * colspan=3 style="border: 5px solid black; background-color: lightblue; line-height:1.5" |

Deletion

 * I put Shohei Suzukiup for deltion. I just put this here to keep track of the article, FYI. The Republican 02:00, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

You forgot to put it on the main AfD page, so I put it on the main page. Just and FYI. Funnybunny 03:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Accept your RfA or face dire consequences
 Funnybunny would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact The Republican to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Requests for adminship/The Republican. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. Funnybunny 00:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh yeah, don't put your RfA on the main page yet, before you answer questions and accept. Funnybunny 00:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Vulcanstar6
thank you for your reply, i see you are a fair person. i will most likely vote for support. Vulcanstar6 02:56, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

As you have accepted your RfA (good, you won't face bad consequences), I have moved it to the main RfA page. Let the election... begin!! Funnybunny 04:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

i answered your question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Adult_Swim

I just wanted to tell you. dposse 03:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship
It is my regretful task to inform you that I have closed your request for adminship early as unlikely to achive consensus. Please do not be discouraged; a number of users have had thier first RfA end without consensus, but have been promoted overwhealmingly in a later request. Please continue to make outstanding contributions to Wikipeida, and consider requesting adminship again in the future. You may find Guide to requests for adminship helpful in deciding when to consider running again. If I can be of any help to you, please do not hesitate to ask. Essjay Talk •  Contact 09:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 17:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * FYI, I voted in the poll like you asked. I voted Support in the poll, But oppose is still winning. The Republican 22:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry to butt in, but the first poll which was going 50-50 also failed. This policy has no hope of passing, and Jimbo has being praising the admin who deleted the lolicon images, calling us who defended the paedophiles. If you're against censorship, your on the wrong site. Gerard Foley 23:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I think many who would take our side against the menace of censorship do not know about this poll. If you have some time to spare, would you mind posting a short message on their talk page (like mine) to let them know of this poll and invite them to voice their opinions? By involving more people, a larger portion of the Wikipedia community can have their say, for or against the policy. Some places you can go for a list of users are Wikipedia_talk:Censorship, Category:Wikipedians_against_censorship and Category:Wikipedians_opposed_to_censorship_of_the_human_body,. Please check that I've not already posted a message with the heading Wikipedia_talk:Censorship in their talk page to avoid double-postings. If you don't have the time, feel free to ignore this request. Thank you. Loom91 09:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Dudeman!
Sorry man, but Thank you for experimenting with the page User_Talk:Funnybunny on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Funnybunny 21:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I just don't want a practical joke trap on my talk page. :( Funnybunny 21:10, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry. The Republican 21:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

It's okay, bud. Funnybunny 21:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Death image
I'm certain you meant no harm on the image, Image:Death.jpg, when you changed it to an image of the Family Guy character, but the former page was an image of A DC comics-related anthropomorphic personification of Death that is meant to be very different from your run-of-the-mill grim reaper. The former picture was an important image on several pages concerning books the character appeared in. Would you please restore it? Finite 22:16, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I would, but I has alredy been reverted. The Republican 23:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you sure? It is still showing up on my computer as the Family Guy Death. Finite 01:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm sure. The Republican 01:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

I've seen this problem before, when you do something, and it doesn't show up at once. You might have to clear your cache by pressing ctrl+F5 (or its equivalent). That might solve your problem, Finite. Funnybunny 04:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Funnybunny, it worked. Sorry for bothering you, Republican. Finite 17:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Removal of information
The Lloyd-Webber crappie should be given its own page. Tranfer the data to a new page. --62.255.232.20 02:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

User:The Republican/Tangea
Please be aware that if you put Underconstruction onto one of your userpages, that page is added to Category:Articles actively undergoing construction. Underconstruction is meant to be used on articles only, not for user subpages. User subpages should not appear in Category:Articles actively undergoing construction. See also. Thanks. --Ligulem 08:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Might want to check this out
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Funny. Cast your desicion there. The Republican 02:17, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh no! Not again! Another userbox war?? Funnybunny 02:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

YES!!! It seems the Pro-Userbox side has won once again in this debate. As of the time I post this message, 25 voted keep and only 4 voted delete. The Anti-Userboxers lose this battle of the Userbox War once again! Funnybunny 04:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, just want you to know that I didn't get your e-mail because my e-mail account was deactivated. Can you send it again?Funnybunny 22:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Sure. The Republican 23:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

About the copyright violation on Jesus Walks
Putting up lyrics for Land of a Thousand Dancesa copyright violation too? I just deleted it, but I wanted to ask, if no one else got a heads up on this.

Yes, if it's copyrighted. The Republican 00:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.

Refernce desk question
I missed that when you asked. It's called a "leading space". See Help:Editing. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:39, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You might want to update your vandalism-counting userbox to 9 times. Some dude with the IP address of 66.65.205.95 vandalized your page four times. Funnybunny 01:19, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'll do that. The Republican 01:20, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you.
Thanks you for protecting my page from someone who vandalised it. But, Please do not use abusive language to him or her ok? Cheers ^^.Daniel5127, 02:10, 19 April 2006(UTC)

Sorry, feeling a little stressed at vandals.The Republican 02:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

OOOPS, Sorry I forgot to write the time and date. I hope you enjoy a lot in Wikipedia.Daniel5127, 02:40, 19 April 2006(UTC).

I like the policy you've proposed! I've voted support for it. I, on the other hand, has a proposed policy also to lessen the stress for all vandal-fighters. here is my proposed policy. Do you like it? Funnybunny 02:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Watch the language
Yo, dropping F-bombs in edit summaries is not cool. Please try to keep it calm and keep it civil. Thanks. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 03:27, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Daniel5127

 * Umm....User:71.138.167.72, the anon who blanked User:Daniel5127's page....is User:Daniel5127. See my comment here. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 03:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I've just added a new poll on my proposed policy. Would kindly vote on it. Thanks. (Just click on the seen this lately link in my signature.) Funnybunny (talk) seen this lately? 02:02, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Ex-vandal?

 * I wasn't an ex-vandal. Well, I was, when I was a beginner, but, that happens to inexperienced beginners who know hardly anything of this site. Weirdy 09:11, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
You're the first ever to say "Per Cini." Just wanted to say thank you. Yes, I am vain.--Cini 16:57, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for joining the QRVS. We are always happy to have new members. General Eisenhower

Do you want an update of your edit count?
I can give you a current count of your edits, if you want. I've got Flcelloguy's Tool to count edits. Funnybunny (talk/Join the QRVS and Spread the Word!) 03:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Using unfree media to decorate lists
Hi. Please don't do this. See Image use policy and Fair use for information on using unfree media on Wikipedia. Thanks. Jkelly 04:22, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * While I understand that the matter can be confusing, a Fair use defense upon use, not upon crediting the copyright holder. Decorating lists with unfree-copyrighted images is something we, as an attempt to create a free, reusable encyclopedia have chosen not to do.  Fair use should explain most questions you have about media not under a free, reusable license.  Note also that Wikipedia does not appropriate everything that it can get away with.  Avoiding copyright paranoia is about worries over being sued, not about our goal of reusability.  Thanks.  Jkelly 23:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Those are some pretty good reasons, putting my doubts unfounded. It's still a shame; the list looks a lot more bland without images. The Republican 01:23, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Someone else has pointed out that another list uses screenshots to depict notable characters from each show, with a detailed Fair use rationale, and that we seem to think that's okay. I'm personally surprised by that, but I assure you that if you add a full rationale for each screenshot to be added to the list, I won't remove them summarily until the issue is revisted by the wider community.  Jkelly 03:51, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Vandal fighting idea
(from Funnybunny's page) I've got an idea to fight vandals! And, you, Funnybunny have done so much anti-vandal work! What if the Counter-Vandalism Unit elected Generals, and after getting much bigger, Lieutenants, Sergeants, etc. But a General would send a code through the levels, like 45.m.K would be "hit random article and look for vandalism". or 86.p.2 would be "fall back and quit searching like a wild maniac". What do you think?-Sabertiger 02:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Sounds nice. It can get the vandals confused about the codes. Funnybunny (talk/Vote for this policy) 02:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Improvment-Each level on the Wikidefcon will indicate a code. Peace, orders are in English. 4 every other letter, etc., maybe.

Okay, we could give this info to General Eisenhower. Funnybunny (talk/I want you to join the QRVS) 03:07, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

What do you think G.E.?-Gangsta-Easter-Bunny 18:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

What do you think The_Republican?--21:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Austin Powers Wiki
A new user named No. 2 has joined our Wiki. He has made very useful edits. Just so you know. (Finally we have a new member!) Funnybunny (talk/QRVS) 00:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * }