User talk:The Gordonia

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Gordon Disney


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Gordon Disney. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S0091 (talk) 21:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Gordon Disney


The page Draft:Gordon Disney has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

"G3: Blatant hoax"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CO GDEN  21:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ''After reviewing all the edits you have made, it is clear you are introducing false information to articles. If you continue, you will be blocked.'' S0091 (talk) 22:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Dakota Fanning.  You failed to cite reliable sources and this is yet another breach of Wikipedia's policies, to which you've been pointed twice.. Meticulo (talk) 04:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

I am so sorry 😞 about this miscommunication I am still new to this encyclopedia and there are things that I did not know please forgive me for any mistakes or false information I have given to be misleading. I did not mean to be rude or untruthful to anybody I did not know and I will post something better next time that is a nice article sorry 😞 again for any confusion, the Gordonia The Gordonia (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Nick-D (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)