User talk:The Gore-met

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia. Recently you made edits to pages regarding Preston Fassel, claiming he has never appeared on the Rue Morgue masthead. If you are the Gore-Met, then surely you must be mistaken, because according to issue #173, you yourself collaborated with him on an article about H.G. Lewis. A review of past Rue Morgues will reveal that he has been on the masthead in a number of issues dating back to 2013 and has written numerous reviews and features for the magazine, including the Bert Gordon cover story of the March 2015 issue, a two-page spread on the Soska Sisters in your Babdook issue, and an interview with Roger Corman in the January issue. I would ask you to please reconsider your vote for him and retracting your statement that he has never appeared on the masthead? I'm currently struggling to maintain his article and a vote of confidence from you would be a tremendous help.Timmybiscool (talk) 02:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

I am the same 'The Gore-muppet' that has been in 165+ issues of Rue Morgue and lovin' it!. You are neither a regular contributor nor a 'Contributing Editor' as you claim. Selling a few freelance DVD reviews does not make you notable as per Wikipedia guidelines. Instead, this is self-promotion and should be deleted.

Also, 'we' have not collaborated on anything. Truth - stick to it.


 * I know Preston and he's shown me issues of RM that appear to have full-length articles written by him in them, and I've seen an issue with a HG Lewis interview that appears to have been written by both of you. Are you saying these are fabrications? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timmybiscool (talk • contribs) 03:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Can we drop the pretense that you are not Preston Fassel and are not overstating your CV and not promoting yourself, please?

You are not and have never been a 'Contributing Editor' for Rue Morgue magazine. You are grossly misrepresenting your notability and do not merit a Wikipedia entry. You made you own page and I am now campaigning more than ever for it to be deleted as it violates the rules of Wikipedia.